ROAM vs. LDEM
Compare and contrast key facts about Hartford Multifactor Emerging Markets ETF (ROAM) and iShares ESG MSCI EM Leaders ETF (LDEM).
ROAM and LDEM are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. ROAM is a passively managed fund by Hartford that tracks the performance of the Hartford Multifactor Emerging Markets Equity Index. It was launched on Feb 26, 2015. LDEM is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI EM Extended ESG Leaders 5% Issuer Capped Index. It was launched on Feb 5, 2020. Both ROAM and LDEM are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
ROAM vs. LDEM - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
ROAM vs. LDEM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ROAM Hartford Multifactor Emerging Markets ETF | 6.43% | 32.08% | 6.21% | 21.28% | -14.78% | 9.32% | 5.56% |
LDEM iShares ESG MSCI EM Leaders ETF | -0.25% | 32.49% | 5.87% | 6.49% | -22.46% | -2.03% | 15.59% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ROAM achieves a 6.43% return, which is significantly higher than LDEM's -0.25% return.
ROAM
- 1D
- 2.47%
- 1M
- -7.36%
- YTD
- 6.43%
- 6M
- 13.25%
- 1Y
- 36.19%
- 3Y*
- 19.94%
- 5Y*
- 9.67%
- 10Y*
- 7.63%
LDEM
- 1D
- 3.27%
- 1M
- -7.84%
- YTD
- -0.25%
- 6M
- 0.54%
- 1Y
- 23.06%
- 3Y*
- 11.73%
- 5Y*
- 1.19%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ROAM vs. LDEM - Expense Ratio Comparison
ROAM has a 0.44% expense ratio, which is higher than LDEM's 0.16% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
ROAM vs. LDEM — Risk / Return Rank
ROAM
LDEM
ROAM vs. LDEM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hartford Multifactor Emerging Markets ETF (ROAM) and iShares ESG MSCI EM Leaders ETF (LDEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ROAM | LDEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.24 | 1.19 | +1.05 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.93 | 1.71 | +1.21 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.44 | 1.24 | +0.20 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.09 | 1.77 | +1.33 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.21 | 6.40 | +6.82 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ROAM | LDEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.24 | 1.19 | +1.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.65 | 0.06 | +0.58 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.43 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.29 | 0.22 | +0.08 |
Correlation
The correlation between ROAM and LDEM is 0.85, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
ROAM vs. LDEM - Dividend Comparison
ROAM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.98%, less than LDEM's 3.26% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ROAM Hartford Multifactor Emerging Markets ETF | 2.98% | 3.17% | 4.15% | 5.40% | 5.23% | 4.22% | 3.04% | 3.55% | 2.54% | 1.84% | 1.89% | 2.25% |
LDEM iShares ESG MSCI EM Leaders ETF | 3.26% | 3.26% | 2.64% | 3.20% | 4.93% | 1.82% | 1.89% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
ROAM vs. LDEM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ROAM drawdown since its inception was -45.47%, which is greater than LDEM's maximum drawdown of -40.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ROAM and LDEM.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| ROAM | LDEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.47% | -40.82% | -4.65% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.63% | -13.21% | +1.58% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.07% | -39.17% | +12.10% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.47% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.69% | -10.37% | +2.68% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.28% | -17.72% | +6.44% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.72% | 3.65% | -0.93% |
Volatility
ROAM vs. LDEM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Hartford Multifactor Emerging Markets ETF (ROAM) is 7.59%, while iShares ESG MSCI EM Leaders ETF (LDEM) has a volatility of 8.07%. This indicates that ROAM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LDEM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| ROAM | LDEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.59% | 8.07% | -0.48% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.01% | 13.06% | -2.05% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.22% | 19.39% | -3.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.03% | 18.95% | -3.92% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.83% | 20.76% | -2.93% |