RNWZ vs. LRCU

Last updated Jun 14, 2026

RNWZ (TrueShares Eagle Global Renewable Energy Income ETF) and LRCU (Tradr 2X Long LRCX Daily ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RNWZ is a Energy Equities fund actively managed by TrueShares, while LRCU is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Tradr. Both are actively managed. At a 0.43 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. RNWZ charges 0.75%/yr vs 1.30%/yr for LRCU.

Performance

RNWZ vs. LRCU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in TrueShares Eagle Global Renewable Energy Income ETF (RNWZ) and Tradr 2X Long LRCX Daily ETF (LRCU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RNWZ achieves a 15.40% return, which is significantly lower than LRCU's 268.21% return.

RNWZ

• 1D: 0.06%
• 1M: 0.92%
• YTD: 15.40%
• 6M: 17.62%
• 1Y: 34.43%
• 3Y*: 11.78%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

LRCU

• 1D: 1.75%
• 1M: 57.23%
• YTD: 268.21%
• 6M: 315.13%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RNWZ vs. LRCU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
RNWZ TrueShares Eagle Global Renewable Energy Income ETF	15.40%	11.89%
LRCU Tradr 2X Long LRCX Daily ETF	268.21%	172.36%

Correlation

The correlation between RNWZ and LRCU is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 19, 2025	0.43

Return for Risk

RNWZ vs. LRCU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RNWZ

RNWZ Risk / Return Rank: 80
RNWZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 79
RNWZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 78
RNWZ Omega Ratio Rank: 76
RNWZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
RNWZ Martin Ratio Rank: 77

LRCU

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RNWZ vs. LRCU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TrueShares Eagle Global Renewable Energy Income ETF (RNWZ) and Tradr 2X Long LRCX Daily ETF (LRCU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	RNWZ	LRCU	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.23	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.04	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.39	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.81	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.90	—	—

Drawdowns

RNWZ vs. LRCU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RNWZ drawdown since its inception was -24.90%, smaller than the maximum LRCU drawdown of -40.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RNWZ and LRCU.

Drawdown Indicators

	RNWZ	LRCU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-24.90%	-40.09%	+15.19%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.07%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-24.74%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.19%	0.00%	-5.19%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.17%	-9.34%	+2.17%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.63%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	RNWZ	LRCU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.01%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.10%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.25%	113.97%	-98.72%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.98%	113.97%	-96.99%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.98%	113.97%	-96.99%

RNWZ vs. LRCU - Expense Ratio Comparison

RNWZ has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than LRCU's 1.30% expense ratio.

Dividends

RNWZ vs. LRCU - Dividend Comparison

RNWZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.94%, while LRCU has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
LRCU Tradr 2X Long LRCX Daily ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
RNWZ TrueShares Eagle Global Renewable Energy Income ETF	1.94%	2.12%	2.36%	3.87%	0.01%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RNWZ and LRCU in my portfolio?

RNWZ and LRCU have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, RNWZ or LRCU?

On fees, RNWZ is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, RNWZ or LRCU?

RNWZ is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.30% for LRCU.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, RNWZ or LRCU?

RNWZ has the higher dividend yield at 1.94%, compared with 0.00% for LRCU.

What is the main difference between RNWZ and LRCU?

RNWZ is categorized as Energy Equities, while LRCU is Leveraged Equities. They also come from different issuers: TrueShares and Tradr. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for RNWZ and 1.30% for LRCU.