RNWZ vs. EIPX

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

RNWZ (TrueShares Eagle Global Renewable Energy Income ETF) and EIPX (FT Energy Income Partners Strategy ETF) are both Energy Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, RNWZ returned 11.64%/yr vs 21.25%/yr for EIPX. At a 0.44 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. RNWZ charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for EIPX.

Performance

RNWZ vs. EIPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in TrueShares Eagle Global Renewable Energy Income ETF (RNWZ) and FT Energy Income Partners Strategy ETF (EIPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RNWZ achieves a 13.62% return, which is significantly lower than EIPX's 20.93% return.

RNWZ

• 1D: -0.37%
• 1M: -2.92%
• YTD: 13.62%
• 6M: 14.12%
• 1Y: 31.84%
• 3Y*: 11.64%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

EIPX

• 1D: 1.02%
• 1M: -3.17%
• YTD: 20.93%
• 6M: 20.98%
• 1Y: 27.12%
• 3Y*: 21.25%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RNWZ vs. EIPX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
RNWZ TrueShares Eagle Global Renewable Energy Income ETF	13.62%	36.33%	-7.36%	-3.89%	-0.74%
EIPX FT Energy Income Partners Strategy ETF	20.93%	11.44%	19.11%	10.74%	0.59%

Correlation

The correlation between RNWZ and EIPX is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.34
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.40
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 9, 2022	0.44

The correlation between RNWZ and EIPX shifts across timeframes, from 0.34 (1 year) to 0.44 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

RNWZ vs. EIPX - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	RNWZ	EIPX
Utilities	41.0%	26.4%
Financial Services	6.7%	-
Industrials	5.3%	4.8%
Basic Materials	4.8%	-
Energy	3.7%	68.4%
Real Estate	3.1%	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Technology	-	0.3%

Return for Risk

RNWZ vs. EIPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RNWZ

RNWZ Risk / Return Rank: 71
RNWZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 70
RNWZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 68
RNWZ Omega Ratio Rank: 67
RNWZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 85
RNWZ Martin Ratio Rank: 67

EIPX

EIPX Risk / Return Rank: 83
EIPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 83
EIPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
EIPX Omega Ratio Rank: 76
EIPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
EIPX Martin Ratio Rank: 84

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RNWZ vs. EIPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TrueShares Eagle Global Renewable Energy Income ETF (RNWZ) and FT Energy Income Partners Strategy ETF (EIPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	RNWZ	EIPX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.10	2.45	-0.35
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.86	3.49	-0.62
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.37	1.41	-0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.34	5.27	-0.93
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.33	16.25	-4.92

RNWZ vs. EIPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RNWZ Sharpe Ratio is 2.10, which is comparable to the EIPX Sharpe Ratio of 2.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RNWZ and EIPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

RNWZ vs. EIPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RNWZ drawdown since its inception was -24.90%, which is greater than EIPX's maximum drawdown of -15.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RNWZ and EIPX.

Drawdown Indicators

	RNWZ	EIPX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-24.90%	-15.43%	-9.47%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.36%	-5.17%	-2.19%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-24.74%	-15.43%	-9.31%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.64%	-3.41%	-3.23%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.16%	-2.29%	-4.87%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.82%	1.67%	+1.15%

Volatility

RNWZ vs. EIPX - Volatility Comparison

TrueShares Eagle Global Renewable Energy Income ETF (RNWZ) has a higher volatility of 3.99% compared to FT Energy Income Partners Strategy ETF (EIPX) at 3.61%. This indicates that RNWZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EIPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RNWZ	EIPX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.99%	3.61%	+0.38%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.21%	8.44%	+3.77%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.30%	11.17%	+4.13%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.95%	15.02%	+1.93%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.95%	15.02%	+1.93%

RNWZ vs. EIPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RNWZ has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than EIPX's 0.95% expense ratio.

Dividends

RNWZ vs. EIPX - Dividend Comparison

RNWZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.97%, less than EIPX's 2.70% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
EIPX FT Energy Income Partners Strategy ETF	2.70%	3.23%	3.27%	3.48%	0.34%
RNWZ TrueShares Eagle Global Renewable Energy Income ETF	1.97%	2.12%	2.36%	3.87%	0.01%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RNWZ and EIPX in my portfolio?

RNWZ and EIPX have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, RNWZ or EIPX?

RNWZ has higher volatility (3.99%) compared to EIPX (3.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RNWZ dropped -24.90% vs EIPX's -15.43%.

Which ETF is better, RNWZ or EIPX?

On 3-year performance, EIPX leads with 21.25% vs 11.64% for RNWZ. On fees, RNWZ is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, EIPX has been the lower-risk option at 3.61%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, RNWZ or EIPX?

Over the 3-year period, EIPX has performed better with a 21.25% return vs 11.64%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, RNWZ or EIPX?

RNWZ is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for EIPX.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, RNWZ or EIPX?

EIPX has the higher dividend yield at 2.70%, compared with 1.97% for RNWZ.

What is the main difference between RNWZ and EIPX?

They also come from different issuers: TrueShares and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for RNWZ and 0.95% for EIPX.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EIPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.45 vs 2.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.