PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RNWGX vs. MDIZX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RNWGX vs. MDIZX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Funds New World Fund® Class R-6 (RNWGX) and MFS International Diversification Fund R6 (MDIZX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RNWGX achieves a 14.65% return, which is significantly higher than MDIZX's 7.70% return.


RNWGX

1D
-0.51%
1M
0.30%
YTD
14.65%
6M
14.70%
1Y
29.49%
3Y*
18.52%
5Y*
6.35%
10Y*
11.53%

MDIZX

1D
0.20%
1M
-1.38%
YTD
7.70%
6M
7.55%
1Y
18.95%
3Y*
15.56%
5Y*
6.82%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RNWGX vs. MDIZX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RNWGX
American Funds New World Fund® Class R-6
14.65%28.67%6.88%16.26%-21.77%5.09%25.30%28.03%-12.00%3.01%
MDIZX
MFS International Diversification Fund R6
7.70%27.99%6.52%14.48%-17.04%7.79%15.45%26.09%-10.93%3.71%

Correlation

The correlation between RNWGX and MDIZX is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.84

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.87

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 19, 2017

0.90

The correlation between RNWGX and MDIZX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RNWGX vs. MDIZX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RNWGX
RNWGX Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
RNWGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RNWGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
RNWGX Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
RNWGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
RNWGX Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank

MDIZX
MDIZX Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
MDIZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MDIZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
MDIZX Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
MDIZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
MDIZX Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RNWGX vs. MDIZX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Funds New World Fund® Class R-6 (RNWGX) and MFS International Diversification Fund R6 (MDIZX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RNWGXMDIZXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.38

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.47

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.27

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.29

1.67

+0.62

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.11

6.26

+2.85

RNWGX vs. MDIZX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RNWGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.81, which is comparable to the MDIZX Sharpe Ratio of 1.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RNWGX and MDIZX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RNWGX vs. MDIZX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RNWGX drawdown since its inception was -33.40%, which is greater than MDIZX's maximum drawdown of -30.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RNWGX and MDIZX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RNWGXMDIZXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.40%

-30.09%

-3.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.00%

-11.36%

-1.64%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.00%

-12.59%

-2.41%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.40%

-30.09%

-3.31%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.51%

-2.35%

-1.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.04%

-6.66%

-1.38%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.26%

3.02%

+0.24%

Volatility

RNWGX vs. MDIZX - Volatility Comparison

American Funds New World Fund® Class R-6 (RNWGX) has a higher volatility of 8.25% compared to MFS International Diversification Fund R6 (MDIZX) at 5.43%. This indicates that RNWGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MDIZX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RNWGXMDIZXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.25%

5.43%

+2.82%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.60%

11.26%

+3.34%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.50%

13.30%

+3.20%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.78%

14.38%

+1.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.22%

15.24%

+0.98%

RNWGX vs. MDIZX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RNWGX has a 0.57% expense ratio, which is lower than MDIZX's 0.73% expense ratio.


Dividends

RNWGX vs. MDIZX - Dividend Comparison

RNWGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.31%, more than MDIZX's 4.88% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MDIZX
MFS International Diversification Fund R6
4.88%5.26%3.61%4.24%2.76%2.79%1.72%2.57%3.23%1.66%0.00%0.00%
RNWGX
American Funds New World Fund® Class R-6
5.31%6.09%4.11%2.88%1.33%7.32%0.44%4.05%2.71%2.26%1.37%1.04%

Frequently Asked Questions


RNWGX and MDIZX have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RNWGX has higher volatility (8.25%) compared to MDIZX (5.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RNWGX dropped -33.40% vs MDIZX's -30.09%.

RNWGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.81 vs 1.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RNWGX and MDIZX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer