PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RNTY vs. TSMY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RNTY vs. TSMY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax Target 12™ Real Estate Option Income ETF (RNTY) and YieldMax TSM Option Income Strategy ETF (TSMY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RNTY achieves a 6.19% return, which is significantly lower than TSMY's 37.04% return.


RNTY

1D
0.75%
1M
-0.56%
YTD
6.19%
6M
6.38%
1Y
8.01%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

TSMY

1D
-1.37%
1M
7.48%
YTD
37.04%
6M
39.21%
1Y
92.13%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RNTY vs. TSMY - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between RNTY and TSMY is -0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.02

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 21, 2025

0.02

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RNTY vs. TSMY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RNTY
RNTY Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
RNTY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RNTY Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
RNTY Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
RNTY Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
RNTY Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank

TSMY
TSMY Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
TSMY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TSMY Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
TSMY Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
TSMY Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
TSMY Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RNTY vs. TSMY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax Target 12™ Real Estate Option Income ETF (RNTY) and YieldMax TSM Option Income Strategy ETF (TSMY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RNTYTSMYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.45

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.77

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.50

-0.37

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.02

5.98

-4.96

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.40

22.18

-18.78

RNTY vs. TSMY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RNTY Sharpe Ratio is 0.76, which is lower than the TSMY Sharpe Ratio of 3.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RNTY and TSMY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RNTYTSMYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.76

3.21

-2.45

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.87

1.56

-0.68

Drawdowns

RNTY vs. TSMY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RNTY drawdown since its inception was -7.91%, smaller than the maximum TSMY drawdown of -31.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RNTY and TSMY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RNTYTSMYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-7.91%

-31.15%

+23.24%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.91%

-15.50%

+7.59%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.12%

-1.37%

-0.75%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.76%

-5.51%

+3.75%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.36%

4.17%

-1.81%

Volatility

RNTY vs. TSMY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for YieldMax Target 12™ Real Estate Option Income ETF (RNTY) is 2.87%, while YieldMax TSM Option Income Strategy ETF (TSMY) has a volatility of 9.52%. This indicates that RNTY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TSMY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RNTYTSMYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.87%

9.52%

-6.65%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.81%

22.68%

-14.87%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.61%

28.87%

-18.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.75%

33.22%

-22.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.75%

33.22%

-22.47%

RNTY vs. TSMY - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both RNTY and TSMY have an expense ratio of 0.99%.


Dividends

RNTY vs. TSMY - Dividend Comparison

RNTY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.30%, less than TSMY's 52.19% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
RNTY
YieldMax Target 12™ Real Estate Option Income ETF
13.30%8.28%0.00%
TSMY
YieldMax TSM Option Income Strategy ETF
52.19%56.76%13.71%

Frequently Asked Questions


RNTY and TSMY have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TSMY has higher volatility (9.52%) compared to RNTY (2.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RNTY dropped -7.91% vs TSMY's -31.15%.

On 1-year performance, TSMY leads with 92.13% vs 8.01% for RNTY. Both ETFs have the same 0.99% expense ratio. On volatility, RNTY has been the lower-risk option at 2.87%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, TSMY has performed better with a 92.13% return vs 8.01%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

RNTY and TSMY have the same expense ratio: 0.99% per year.

TSMY has the higher dividend yield at 52.19%, compared with 13.30% for RNTY.

TSMY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.21 vs 0.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RNTY and TSMY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer