RNTY vs. OMAH

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

RNTY (YieldMax Target 12™ Real Estate Option Income ETF) and OMAH (VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, RNTY returned 8.01% vs 11.44% for OMAH. At a 0.40 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. RNTY charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for OMAH.

Performance

RNTY vs. OMAH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax Target 12™ Real Estate Option Income ETF (RNTY) and VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF (OMAH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RNTY achieves a 6.19% return, which is significantly higher than OMAH's 4.56% return.

RNTY

• 1D: 0.75%
• 1M: -0.56%
• YTD: 6.19%
• 6M: 6.38%
• 1Y: 8.01%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

OMAH

• 1D: -0.70%
• 1M: 0.44%
• YTD: 4.56%
• 6M: 4.00%
• 1Y: 11.44%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RNTY vs. OMAH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
RNTY YieldMax Target 12™ Real Estate Option Income ETF	6.19%	4.10%
OMAH VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF	4.56%	12.63%

Correlation

The correlation between RNTY and OMAH is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.37
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 21, 2025	0.40

Return for Risk

RNTY vs. OMAH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RNTY

RNTY Risk / Return Rank: 22
RNTY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
RNTY Sortino Ratio Rank: 20
RNTY Omega Ratio Rank: 20
RNTY Calmar Ratio Rank: 23
RNTY Martin Ratio Rank: 25

OMAH

OMAH Risk / Return Rank: 49
OMAH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 39
OMAH Sortino Ratio Rank: 38
OMAH Omega Ratio Rank: 37
OMAH Calmar Ratio Rank: 75
OMAH Martin Ratio Rank: 54

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RNTY vs. OMAH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax Target 12™ Real Estate Option Income ETF (RNTY) and VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF (OMAH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	RNTY	OMAH	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.76	1.43	-0.67
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.09	2.02	-0.93
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.14	1.25	-0.12
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.02	3.82	-2.81
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.40	9.48	-6.08
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

RNTY vs. OMAH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RNTY Sharpe Ratio is 0.76, which is lower than the OMAH Sharpe Ratio of 1.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RNTY and OMAH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	RNTY	OMAH	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.76	1.43	-0.67
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.87	0.70	+0.17

Drawdowns

RNTY vs. OMAH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RNTY drawdown since its inception was -7.91%, smaller than the maximum OMAH drawdown of -11.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RNTY and OMAH.

Drawdown Indicators

	RNTY	OMAH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-7.91%	-11.83%	+3.92%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.91%	-3.00%	-4.91%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.12%	-2.65%	+0.53%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.76%	-1.26%	-0.50%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.36%	1.21%	+1.15%

Volatility

RNTY vs. OMAH - Volatility Comparison

YieldMax Target 12™ Real Estate Option Income ETF (RNTY) has a higher volatility of 2.87% compared to VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF (OMAH) at 1.93%. This indicates that RNTY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than OMAH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RNTY	OMAH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.87%	1.93%	+0.94%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.81%	5.49%	+2.32%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.61%	8.05%	+2.56%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.75%	13.21%	-2.46%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	10.75%	13.21%	-2.46%

RNTY vs. OMAH - Expense Ratio Comparison

RNTY has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than OMAH's 0.95% expense ratio.

Dividends

RNTY vs. OMAH - Dividend Comparison

RNTY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.30%, less than OMAH's 15.44% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
OMAH VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF	15.44%	12.86%
RNTY YieldMax Target 12™ Real Estate Option Income ETF	13.30%	8.28%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RNTY and OMAH in my portfolio?

RNTY and OMAH have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, RNTY or OMAH?

RNTY has higher volatility (2.87%) compared to OMAH (1.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RNTY dropped -7.91% vs OMAH's -11.83%.

Which ETF is better, RNTY or OMAH?

On 1-year performance, OMAH leads with 11.44% vs 8.01% for RNTY. On fees, OMAH is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, OMAH has been the lower-risk option at 1.93%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, RNTY or OMAH?

Over the 1-year period, OMAH has performed better with a 11.44% return vs 8.01%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, RNTY or OMAH?

OMAH is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for RNTY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, RNTY or OMAH?

OMAH has the higher dividend yield at 15.44%, compared with 13.30% for RNTY.

What is the main difference between RNTY and OMAH?

They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and VistaShares. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for RNTY and 0.95% for OMAH.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

OMAH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.43 vs 0.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.