PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RNTY vs. NVDY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RNTY vs. NVDY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax Target 12™ Real Estate Option Income ETF (RNTY) and YieldMax NVDA Option Income Strategy ETF (NVDY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RNTY achieves a 8.36% return, which is significantly higher than NVDY's 6.53% return.


RNTY

1D
0.05%
1M
0.86%
YTD
8.36%
6M
8.76%
1Y
8.14%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

NVDY

1D
-0.48%
1M
-5.66%
YTD
6.53%
6M
5.92%
1Y
31.11%
3Y*
50.35%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RNTY vs. NVDY - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between RNTY and NVDY is -0.13, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.13

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 17, 2025

-0.06

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RNTY vs. NVDY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RNTY
RNTY Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
RNTY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RNTY Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
RNTY Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
RNTY Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
RNTY Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank

NVDY
NVDY Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
NVDY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NVDY Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
NVDY Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
NVDY Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
NVDY Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RNTY vs. NVDY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax Target 12™ Real Estate Option Income ETF (RNTY) and YieldMax NVDA Option Income Strategy ETF (NVDY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RNTYNVDYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.36

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.51

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.20

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.03

2.44

-1.40

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.45

5.50

-2.05

RNTY vs. NVDY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RNTY Sharpe Ratio is 0.75, which is lower than the NVDY Sharpe Ratio of 1.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RNTY and NVDY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RNTY vs. NVDY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RNTY drawdown since its inception was -7.91%, smaller than the maximum NVDY drawdown of -34.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RNTY and NVDY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RNTYNVDYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-7.91%

-34.08%

+26.17%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.91%

-12.81%

+4.90%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-34.08%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.24%

-12.05%

+11.81%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.70%

-6.20%

+4.50%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.38%

5.67%

-3.29%

Volatility

RNTY vs. NVDY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for YieldMax Target 12™ Real Estate Option Income ETF (RNTY) is 3.65%, while YieldMax NVDA Option Income Strategy ETF (NVDY) has a volatility of 10.03%. This indicates that RNTY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NVDY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RNTYNVDYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.65%

10.03%

-6.38%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.22%

21.44%

-13.22%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.97%

28.33%

-17.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.87%

38.17%

-27.30%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.87%

38.17%

-27.30%

RNTY vs. NVDY - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both RNTY and NVDY have an expense ratio of 0.99%.


Dividends

RNTY vs. NVDY - Dividend Comparison

RNTY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.00%, less than NVDY's 64.61% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
NVDY
YieldMax NVDA Option Income Strategy ETF
64.61%83.10%83.65%22.32%
RNTY
YieldMax Target 12™ Real Estate Option Income ETF
12.00%8.28%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


RNTY and NVDY have a correlation of -0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NVDY has higher volatility (10.03%) compared to RNTY (3.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RNTY dropped -7.91% vs NVDY's -34.08%.

On 1-year performance, NVDY leads with 31.11% vs 8.14% for RNTY. Both ETFs have the same 0.99% expense ratio. On volatility, RNTY has been the lower-risk option at 3.65%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, NVDY has performed better with a 31.11% return vs 8.14%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

RNTY and NVDY have the same expense ratio: 0.99% per year.

NVDY has the higher dividend yield at 64.61%, compared with 12.00% for RNTY.

NVDY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.10 vs 0.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RNTY and NVDY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer