PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RNTY vs. DBC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RNTY vs. DBC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax Target 12™ Real Estate Option Income ETF (RNTY) and Invesco DB Commodity Index Tracking Fund (DBC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RNTY achieves a 5.40% return, which is significantly lower than DBC's 34.70% return.


RNTY

1D
0.24%
1M
-1.32%
YTD
5.40%
6M
5.87%
1Y
6.89%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

DBC

1D
0.43%
1M
-2.24%
YTD
34.70%
6M
35.25%
1Y
46.03%
3Y*
14.87%
5Y*
12.90%
10Y*
9.04%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RNTY vs. DBC - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between RNTY and DBC is -0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.06

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 21, 2025

-0.08

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RNTY vs. DBC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RNTY
RNTY Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
RNTY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RNTY Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
RNTY Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
RNTY Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
RNTY Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank

DBC
DBC Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
DBC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DBC Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
DBC Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
DBC Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
DBC Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RNTY vs. DBC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax Target 12™ Real Estate Option Income ETF (RNTY) and Invesco DB Commodity Index Tracking Fund (DBC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RNTYDBCDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.65

2.48

-1.82

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.95

3.17

-2.22

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

1.43

-0.31

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.90

6.97

-6.07

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.00

14.90

-11.90

RNTY vs. DBC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RNTY Sharpe Ratio is 0.65, which is lower than the DBC Sharpe Ratio of 2.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RNTY and DBC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RNTYDBCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.65

2.48

-1.82

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.51

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.81

0.12

+0.69

Drawdowns

RNTY vs. DBC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RNTY drawdown since its inception was -7.91%, smaller than the maximum DBC drawdown of -76.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RNTY and DBC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RNTYDBCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-7.91%

-76.36%

+68.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.91%

-7.05%

-0.86%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.82%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.34%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.71%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.84%

-22.08%

+19.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.76%

-46.22%

+44.46%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.36%

3.30%

-0.94%

Volatility

RNTY vs. DBC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for YieldMax Target 12™ Real Estate Option Income ETF (RNTY) is 2.75%, while Invesco DB Commodity Index Tracking Fund (DBC) has a volatility of 6.67%. This indicates that RNTY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DBC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RNTYDBCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.75%

6.67%

-3.92%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.83%

15.75%

-7.92%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.59%

18.78%

-8.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.74%

19.18%

-8.44%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.74%

17.81%

-7.07%

RNTY vs. DBC - Expense Ratio Comparison

RNTY has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than DBC's 0.85% expense ratio.


Dividends

RNTY vs. DBC - Dividend Comparison

RNTY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.26%, more than DBC's 2.47% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
DBC
Invesco DB Commodity Index Tracking Fund
2.47%3.33%5.22%4.94%0.59%0.00%0.00%1.59%1.30%
RNTY
YieldMax Target 12™ Real Estate Option Income ETF
12.26%8.28%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


RNTY and DBC have a correlation of -0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DBC has higher volatility (6.67%) compared to RNTY (2.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RNTY dropped -7.91% vs DBC's -76.36%.

On 1-year performance, DBC leads with 46.03% vs 6.89% for RNTY. On fees, DBC is cheaper at 0.85% per year. On volatility, RNTY has been the lower-risk option at 2.75%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, DBC has performed better with a 46.03% return vs 6.89%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DBC is cheaper with a 0.85% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for RNTY.

RNTY has the higher dividend yield at 12.26%, compared with 2.47% for DBC.

RNTY is categorized as Derivative Income, while DBC is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for RNTY and 0.85% for DBC.

DBC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.48 vs 0.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RNTY and DBC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer