PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RNTY vs. ALAI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RNTY vs. ALAI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax Target 12™ Real Estate Option Income ETF (RNTY) and Alger AI Enablers & Adopters ETF (ALAI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RNTY achieves a 8.31% return, which is significantly lower than ALAI's 23.84% return.


RNTY

1D
1.02%
1M
0.81%
YTD
8.31%
6M
9.35%
1Y
8.55%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

ALAI

1D
-3.08%
1M
2.64%
YTD
23.84%
6M
21.16%
1Y
55.24%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RNTY vs. ALAI - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between RNTY and ALAI is -0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.06

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 17, 2025

-0.03

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RNTY vs. ALAI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RNTY
RNTY Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
RNTY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RNTY Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
RNTY Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
RNTY Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
RNTY Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank

ALAI
ALAI Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
ALAI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ALAI Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
ALAI Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
ALAI Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
ALAI Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RNTY vs. ALAI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax Target 12™ Real Estate Option Income ETF (RNTY) and Alger AI Enablers & Adopters ETF (ALAI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RNTYALAIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.36

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.60

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.35

-0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.09

2.85

-1.76

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.61

8.95

-5.34

RNTY vs. ALAI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RNTY Sharpe Ratio is 0.78, which is lower than the ALAI Sharpe Ratio of 2.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RNTY and ALAI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RNTY vs. ALAI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RNTY drawdown since its inception was -7.91%, smaller than the maximum ALAI drawdown of -29.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RNTY and ALAI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RNTYALAIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-7.91%

-29.36%

+21.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.91%

-19.48%

+11.57%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.29%

-4.34%

+4.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.71%

-5.12%

+3.41%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.38%

6.19%

-3.81%

Volatility

RNTY vs. ALAI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for YieldMax Target 12™ Real Estate Option Income ETF (RNTY) is 3.66%, while Alger AI Enablers & Adopters ETF (ALAI) has a volatility of 11.00%. This indicates that RNTY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ALAI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RNTYALAIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.66%

11.00%

-7.34%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.25%

20.54%

-12.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.99%

25.98%

-14.99%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.89%

28.89%

-18.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.89%

28.89%

-18.00%

RNTY vs. ALAI - Expense Ratio Comparison

RNTY has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than ALAI's 0.55% expense ratio.


Dividends

RNTY vs. ALAI - Dividend Comparison

RNTY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.01%, more than ALAI's 1.21% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
ALAI
Alger AI Enablers & Adopters ETF
1.21%1.50%0.66%
RNTY
YieldMax Target 12™ Real Estate Option Income ETF
12.01%8.28%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


RNTY and ALAI have a correlation of -0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ALAI has higher volatility (11.00%) compared to RNTY (3.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RNTY dropped -7.91% vs ALAI's -29.36%.

On 1-year performance, ALAI leads with 55.24% vs 8.55% for RNTY. On fees, ALAI is cheaper at 0.55% per year. On volatility, RNTY has been the lower-risk option at 3.66%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, ALAI has performed better with a 55.24% return vs 8.55%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ALAI is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for RNTY.

RNTY has the higher dividend yield at 12.01%, compared with 1.21% for ALAI.

RNTY is categorized as Derivative Income, while ALAI is Technology Equities. They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and Alger. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for RNTY and 0.55% for ALAI.

ALAI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.14 vs 0.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RNTY and ALAI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer