PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RNSIX vs. MOFIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RNSIX vs. MOFIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in RiverNorth Doubleline Strategic Income Fund (RNSIX) and Mercer Opportunistic Fixed Income Fund (MOFIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RNSIX achieves a 0.66% return, which is significantly higher than MOFIX's -1.06% return.


RNSIX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.31%
YTD
0.66%
6M
0.64%
1Y
5.88%
3Y*
7.23%
5Y*
2.37%
10Y*
3.83%

MOFIX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.24%
YTD
-1.06%
6M
-0.56%
1Y
3.60%
3Y*
5.62%
5Y*
1.50%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RNSIX vs. MOFIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
RNSIX
RiverNorth Doubleline Strategic Income Fund
0.66%7.59%7.29%9.18%-12.68%3.66%6.03%5.84%
MOFIX
Mercer Opportunistic Fixed Income Fund
-1.06%8.60%2.23%12.22%-11.57%-1.15%5.31%3.18%

Correlation

The correlation between RNSIX and MOFIX is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.64

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.67

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 17, 2019

0.61

The correlation between RNSIX and MOFIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.61 to 0.67 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RNSIX vs. MOFIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RNSIX
RNSIX Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
RNSIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RNSIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
RNSIX Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
RNSIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
RNSIX Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank

MOFIX
MOFIX Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
MOFIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MOFIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
MOFIX Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
MOFIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
MOFIX Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RNSIX vs. MOFIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RiverNorth Doubleline Strategic Income Fund (RNSIX) and Mercer Opportunistic Fixed Income Fund (MOFIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RNSIXMOFIXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.11

1.41

+0.70

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.19

2.11

+1.08

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.28

+0.14

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.88

1.20

+1.68

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

10.21

3.74

+6.47

RNSIX vs. MOFIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RNSIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.11, which is higher than the MOFIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RNSIX and MOFIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RNSIXMOFIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.11

1.41

+0.70

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.54

0.21

+0.32

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.86

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.23

0.33

+0.90

Drawdowns

RNSIX vs. MOFIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RNSIX drawdown since its inception was -16.08%, smaller than the maximum MOFIX drawdown of -19.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RNSIX and MOFIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RNSIXMOFIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.08%

-19.96%

+3.88%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.05%

-3.52%

+1.47%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.14%

-8.02%

+2.88%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.08%

-19.00%

+2.92%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-16.08%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.44%

-1.53%

+1.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.07%

-5.18%

+3.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.58%

1.06%

-0.48%

Volatility

RNSIX vs. MOFIX - Volatility Comparison

RiverNorth Doubleline Strategic Income Fund (RNSIX) and Mercer Opportunistic Fixed Income Fund (MOFIX) have volatilities of 0.96% and 0.97%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RNSIXMOFIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.96%

0.97%

-0.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.02%

2.37%

-0.35%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.80%

2.99%

-0.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.44%

7.26%

-2.82%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.48%

7.18%

-2.70%

RNSIX vs. MOFIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RNSIX has a 0.87% expense ratio, which is higher than MOFIX's 0.44% expense ratio.


Dividends

RNSIX vs. MOFIX - Dividend Comparison

RNSIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.64%, more than MOFIX's 3.36% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MOFIX
Mercer Opportunistic Fixed Income Fund
3.36%3.32%6.91%6.44%3.81%4.20%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
RNSIX
RiverNorth Doubleline Strategic Income Fund
6.64%6.52%6.37%5.13%8.40%4.20%4.34%5.17%5.45%5.08%5.22%5.83%

Frequently Asked Questions


RNSIX and MOFIX have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MOFIX has higher volatility (0.97%) compared to RNSIX (0.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RNSIX dropped -16.08% vs MOFIX's -19.96%.

RNSIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.11 vs 1.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RNSIX and MOFIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer