PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RNSC vs. ROSC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RNSC vs. ROSC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Furst Trust Small Cap US Equity Select ETF (RNSC) and Hartford Multifactor Small Cap ETF (ROSC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RNSC achieves a 1.36% return, which is significantly lower than ROSC's 12.98% return.


RNSC

1D
-0.79%
1M
-1.06%
YTD
1.36%
6M
0.22%
1Y
5.24%
3Y*
6.79%
5Y*
2.20%
10Y*

ROSC

1D
-0.41%
1M
0.22%
YTD
12.98%
6M
14.18%
1Y
32.77%
3Y*
15.76%
5Y*
8.30%
10Y*
10.49%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RNSC vs. ROSC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RNSC
Furst Trust Small Cap US Equity Select ETF
1.36%2.41%6.38%15.98%-13.17%25.56%10.26%21.31%-11.92%10.39%
ROSC
Hartford Multifactor Small Cap ETF
12.98%10.18%7.28%18.88%-10.58%31.37%5.27%17.09%-12.38%14.21%

Correlation

The correlation between RNSC and ROSC is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.85

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.91

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 23, 2017

0.85

The correlation between RNSC and ROSC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

RNSC vs. ROSC - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
RNSC
ROSC

Healthcare

16.8%
20.1%

Financial Services

16.1%
18.7%

Industrials

15.8%
11.2%

Consumer Cyclical

11.1%
14.1%

Technology

10.5%
12.1%

Real Estate

9.5%
5.5%

Communication Services

5.0%
3.6%

Basic Materials

4.6%
2.5%

Consumer Defensive

4.5%
6.6%

Energy

3.7%
3.8%

Utilities

2.1%
1.9%

Healthcare

RNSC
16.8%
ROSC
20.1%

Financial Services

RNSC
16.1%
ROSC
18.7%

Industrials

RNSC
15.8%
ROSC
11.2%

Consumer Cyclical

RNSC
11.1%
ROSC
14.1%

Technology

RNSC
10.5%
ROSC
12.1%

Real Estate

RNSC
9.5%
ROSC
5.5%

Communication Services

RNSC
5.0%
ROSC
3.6%

Basic Materials

RNSC
4.6%
ROSC
2.5%

Consumer Defensive

RNSC
4.5%
ROSC
6.6%

Energy

RNSC
3.7%
ROSC
3.8%

Utilities

RNSC
2.1%
ROSC
1.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RNSC vs. ROSC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RNSC
RNSC Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
RNSC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RNSC Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
RNSC Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
RNSC Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
RNSC Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank

ROSC
ROSC Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
ROSC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ROSC Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
ROSC Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
ROSC Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
ROSC Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RNSC vs. ROSC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Furst Trust Small Cap US Equity Select ETF (RNSC) and Hartford Multifactor Small Cap ETF (ROSC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RNSCROSCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.77

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.48

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.07

1.37

-0.30

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.46

4.25

-3.78

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.32

13.76

-12.44

RNSC vs. ROSC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RNSC Sharpe Ratio is 0.34, which is lower than the ROSC Sharpe Ratio of 2.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RNSC and ROSC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RNSCROSCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.34

2.11

-1.77

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.11

0.43

-0.32

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.52

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.30

0.47

-0.16

Drawdowns

RNSC vs. ROSC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RNSC drawdown since its inception was -43.26%, roughly equal to the maximum ROSC drawdown of -43.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RNSC and ROSC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RNSCROSCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.26%

-43.13%

-0.13%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.31%

-7.75%

-3.56%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.08%

-23.74%

-0.34%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.08%

-23.74%

-0.34%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.65%

-0.65%

-4.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.03%

-7.21%

-0.82%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.98%

2.39%

+1.59%

Volatility

RNSC vs. ROSC - Volatility Comparison

Furst Trust Small Cap US Equity Select ETF (RNSC) and Hartford Multifactor Small Cap ETF (ROSC) have volatilities of 3.65% and 3.74%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RNSCROSCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.65%

3.74%

-0.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.76%

10.35%

+0.41%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.25%

15.58%

-0.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.14%

19.32%

+0.82%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.80%

20.28%

+2.52%

RNSC vs. ROSC - Expense Ratio Comparison

RNSC has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than ROSC's 0.34% expense ratio.


Dividends

RNSC vs. ROSC - Dividend Comparison

RNSC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ROSC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.85%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RNSC
Furst Trust Small Cap US Equity Select ETF
0.00%0.00%2.71%2.29%1.95%1.35%1.32%1.77%2.13%1.15%0.00%0.00%
ROSC
Hartford Multifactor Small Cap ETF
1.85%2.08%2.00%2.01%1.51%2.13%1.75%3.05%2.86%2.13%2.20%2.48%

Frequently Asked Questions


RNSC and ROSC have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ROSC has higher volatility (3.74%) compared to RNSC (3.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RNSC dropped -43.26% vs ROSC's -43.13%.

On 5-year performance, ROSC leads with 8.30% vs 2.20% for RNSC. On fees, ROSC is cheaper at 0.34% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, ROSC has performed better with a 8.30% return vs 2.20%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ROSC is cheaper with a 0.34% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for RNSC.

ROSC has the higher dividend yield at 1.85%, compared with 0.00% for RNSC.

RNSC tracks Nasdaq Riskalyze Small Cap US Equity Select Index, while ROSC tracks ROSC-US - Hartford Multifactor Small Cap Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Hartford. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for RNSC and 0.34% for ROSC.

ROSC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.11 vs 0.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RNSC and ROSC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer