RNRG vs. RAYS

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

RNRG (Global X Funds Global X Renewable Energy Producers ETF) and RAYS (Global X Solar ETF) are both Alternative Energy Equities funds from Global X - RNRG tracks the Indxx Renewable Energy Producers Index while RAYS tracks the Solactive Solar Index. Both are passively managed. RNRG charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for RAYS.

Performance

RNRG vs. RAYS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Funds Global X Renewable Energy Producers ETF (RNRG) and Global X Solar ETF (RAYS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

RNRG

• 1D: -1.05%
• 1M: -1.46%
• YTD: 16.42%
• 6M: 15.60%
• 1Y: 40.09%
• 3Y*: 4.03%
• 5Y*: -2.90%
• 10Y*: 4.26%

RAYS

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RNRG vs. RAYS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
RNRG Global X Funds Global X Renewable Energy Producers ETF	6.50%
RAYS Global X Solar ETF	0.00%

RNRG vs. RAYS - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	RNRG	RAYS
Utilities	92.8%	6.8%
Industrials	3.0%	21.4%
Technology	2.2%	66.9%
Basic Materials	2.1%	0.9%
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	4.0%
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Real Estate	-	-

Return for Risk

RNRG vs. RAYS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RNRG

RNRG Risk / Return Rank: 82
RNRG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 80
RNRG Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
RNRG Omega Ratio Rank: 72
RNRG Calmar Ratio Rank: 93
RNRG Martin Ratio Rank: 88

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RNRG vs. RAYS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Funds Global X Renewable Energy Producers ETF (RNRG) and Global X Solar ETF (RAYS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	RNRG	RAYS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.55	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.39	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.42	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	6.77	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	18.73	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	RNRG	RAYS	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.55	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.15	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.22	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.06	—	—

Drawdowns

RNRG vs. RAYS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RNRG drawdown since its inception was -58.79%, which is greater than RAYS's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RNRG and RAYS.

Drawdown Indicators

	RNRG	RAYS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-58.79%	0.00%	-58.79%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.95%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-35.23%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-52.17%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-58.79%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-31.11%	0.00%	-31.11%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-24.45%	0.00%	-24.45%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.15%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	RNRG	RAYS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.50%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.14%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.82%	0.00%	+15.82%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.09%	0.00%	+20.09%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.67%	0.00%	+19.67%

RNRG vs. RAYS - Expense Ratio Comparison

RNRG has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than RAYS's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

RNRG vs. RAYS - Dividend Comparison

RNRG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.29%, while RAYS has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
RAYS Global X Solar ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
RNRG Global X Funds Global X Renewable Energy Producers ETF	1.29%	1.50%	1.48%	1.44%	1.15%	1.10%	3.16%	2.97%	5.22%	4.14%	5.02%	3.48%

Frequently Asked Questions

Which ETF is better, RNRG or RAYS?

On fees, RAYS is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, RNRG or RAYS?

RAYS is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for RNRG.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, RNRG or RAYS?

RNRG has the higher dividend yield at 1.29%, compared with 0.00% for RAYS.

What is the main difference between RNRG and RAYS?

RNRG tracks Indxx Renewable Energy Producers Index, while RAYS tracks Solactive Solar Index. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for RNRG and 0.50% for RAYS.