RNRG.L vs. RAYZ.L
RNRG.L (Global X Renewable Energy Producers UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and RAYZ.L (Global X Solar UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both Alternative Energy Equities funds from Global X - RNRG.L tracks the Indxx Renewable Energy Producers v2 Index while RAYZ.L tracks the Solactive Solar v2 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, RNRG.L returned 1.38%/yr vs -13.14%/yr for RAYZ.L. A 0.56 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.50% expense ratio.
Performance
RNRG.L vs. RAYZ.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RNRG.L achieves a 8.41% return, which is significantly higher than RAYZ.L's -11.74% return.
RNRG.L
- 1D
- -0.39%
- 1M
- -3.01%
- 6M
- 3.78%
- YTD
- 8.41%
- 1Y
- 26.13%
- 3Y*
- 1.38%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RAYZ.L
- 1D
- -2.79%
- 1M
- -21.34%
- 6M
- -17.20%
- YTD
- -11.74%
- 1Y
- 19.58%
- 3Y*
- -13.14%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RNRG.L vs. RAYZ.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RNRG.L Global X Renewable Energy Producers UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 8.41% | 34.05% | -23.00% | -14.97% | -1.08% |
RAYZ.L Global X Solar UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | -11.74% | 39.95% | -28.16% | -32.65% | 4.13% |
Correlation
The correlation between RNRG.L and RAYZ.L is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 15, 2022 | 0.56 |
The correlation between RNRG.L and RAYZ.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.52 to 0.56 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RNRG.L vs. RAYZ.L — Risk / Return Rank
RNRG.L
RAYZ.L
RNRG.L vs. RAYZ.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Renewable Energy Producers UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (RNRG.L) and Global X Solar UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (RAYZ.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RNRG.L | RAYZ.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.86 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.04 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.12 | +0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.84 | 0.61 | +1.23 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.25 | 2.18 | +4.07 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RNRG.L vs. RAYZ.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RNRG.L drawdown since its inception was -51.14%, smaller than the maximum RAYZ.L drawdown of -69.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RNRG.L and RAYZ.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RNRG.L | RAYZ.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -51.14% | -69.13% | +17.99% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.11% | -31.77% | +17.66% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -37.17% | -56.80% | +19.63% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -19.88% | -52.81% | +32.93% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -26.53% | -40.53% | +14.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.17% | 8.98% | -4.81% |
Volatility
RNRG.L vs. RAYZ.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Global X Renewable Energy Producers UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (RNRG.L) is 4.77%, while Global X Solar UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (RAYZ.L) has a volatility of 11.58%. This indicates that RNRG.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RAYZ.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RNRG.L | RAYZ.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.77% | 11.58% | -6.81% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.52% | 25.75% | -11.23% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.19% | 34.35% | -16.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.44% | 34.25% | -12.81% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.44% | 34.25% | -12.81% |
RNRG.L vs. RAYZ.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both RNRG.L and RAYZ.L have an expense ratio of 0.50%.
Dividends
RNRG.L vs. RAYZ.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither RNRG.L nor RAYZ.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
RNRG.L and RAYZ.L have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.50% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
RNRG.L and RAYZ.L have the same expense ratio: 0.50% per year.
RNRG.L tracks Indxx Renewable Energy Producers v2 Index, while RAYZ.L tracks Solactive Solar v2 Index.
Find the right allocation for RNRG.L and RAYZ.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer