RNPEX vs. MDGCX

Last updated Jun 26, 2026

RNPEX (American Funds New Perspective Fund Class R4) and MDGCX (BlackRock Advantage Global Fund, Inc.) are both Global Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, RNPEX returned 13.66%/yr vs 12.50%/yr for MDGCX. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. RNPEX charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.96%/yr for MDGCX.

Performance

RNPEX vs. MDGCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Funds New Perspective Fund Class R4 (RNPEX) and BlackRock Advantage Global Fund, Inc. (MDGCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RNPEX achieves a 4.48% return, which is significantly lower than MDGCX's 14.67% return. Over the past 10 years, RNPEX has outperformed MDGCX with an annualized return of 13.66%, while MDGCX has yielded a comparatively lower 12.50% annualized return.

RNPEX

• 1D: 0.07%
• 1M: -0.91%
• YTD: 4.48%
• 6M: 3.72%
• 1Y: 15.01%
• 3Y*: 17.12%
• 5Y*: 7.67%
• 10Y*: 13.66%

MDGCX

• 1D: -0.44%
• 1M: -2.22%
• YTD: 14.67%
• 6M: 13.93%
• 1Y: 31.96%
• 3Y*: 19.82%
• 5Y*: 10.57%
• 10Y*: 12.50%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RNPEX vs. MDGCX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
RNPEX American Funds New Perspective Fund Class R4	4.48%	21.28%	16.71%	24.62%	-25.94%	17.60%	33.40%	30.05%	-6.03%	28.84%
MDGCX BlackRock Advantage Global Fund, Inc.	14.67%	23.61%	10.87%	22.43%	-17.94%	17.52%	15.61%	25.54%	-11.73%	23.41%

Correlation

The correlation between RNPEX and MDGCX is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.94
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.94
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.96
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.93
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 28, 2002	0.91

The correlation between RNPEX and MDGCX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

RNPEX vs. MDGCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RNPEX

RNPEX Risk / Return Rank: 22
RNPEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 21
RNPEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 20
RNPEX Omega Ratio Rank: 21
RNPEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 20
RNPEX Martin Ratio Rank: 28

MDGCX

MDGCX Risk / Return Rank: 86
MDGCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 85
MDGCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 80
MDGCX Omega Ratio Rank: 80
MDGCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
MDGCX Martin Ratio Rank: 94

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RNPEX vs. MDGCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Funds New Perspective Fund Class R4 (RNPEX) and BlackRock Advantage Global Fund, Inc. (MDGCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	RNPEX	MDGCX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.04	2.38	-1.34
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.51	3.18	-1.66
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.20	1.43	-0.24
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.29	3.97	-2.67
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.34	17.01	-11.67

RNPEX vs. MDGCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RNPEX Sharpe Ratio is 1.04, which is lower than the MDGCX Sharpe Ratio of 2.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RNPEX and MDGCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

RNPEX vs. MDGCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RNPEX drawdown since its inception was -52.36%, which is greater than MDGCX's maximum drawdown of -48.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RNPEX and MDGCX.

Drawdown Indicators

	RNPEX	MDGCX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-52.36%	-48.25%	-4.11%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.48%	-8.07%	-3.41%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.92%	-21.46%	+3.54%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-34.46%	-26.68%	-7.78%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-34.46%	-34.87%	+0.41%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.67%	-4.28%	+1.61%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.95%	-9.92%	+1.97%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.78%	1.88%	+0.90%

Volatility

RNPEX vs. MDGCX - Volatility Comparison

American Funds New Perspective Fund Class R4 (RNPEX) has a higher volatility of 6.10% compared to BlackRock Advantage Global Fund, Inc. (MDGCX) at 5.73%. This indicates that RNPEX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MDGCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RNPEX	MDGCX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.10%	5.73%	+0.37%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.04%	11.20%	+0.84%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.40%	13.50%	+0.90%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.37%	16.29%	+1.08%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.82%	17.20%	+0.62%

RNPEX vs. MDGCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RNPEX has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than MDGCX's 0.96% expense ratio.

Dividends

RNPEX vs. MDGCX - Dividend Comparison

RNPEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.37%, less than MDGCX's 7.77% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
MDGCX BlackRock Advantage Global Fund, Inc.	7.77%	8.91%	7.78%	1.42%	1.75%	16.75%	3.77%	1.73%	4.06%	34.82%	0.65%	5.18%
RNPEX American Funds New Perspective Fund Class R4	6.37%	6.66%	5.20%	5.44%	4.18%	7.08%	4.18%	3.69%	7.63%	5.54%	3.89%	6.17%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RNPEX and MDGCX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.94, RNPEX and MDGCX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, RNPEX or MDGCX?

RNPEX has higher volatility (6.10%) compared to MDGCX (5.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RNPEX dropped -52.36% vs MDGCX's -48.25%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MDGCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.38 vs 1.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.