PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RNMN vs. FLDZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RNMN vs. FLDZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in RiverNorth Market Neutral ETF (RNMN) and RiverNorth Patriot ETF (FLDZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


RNMN

1D
0.00%
1M
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

FLDZ

1D
-0.52%
1M
1.46%
6M
4.23%
YTD
6.90%
1Y
7.69%
3Y*
12.28%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RNMN vs. FLDZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RNMN vs. FLDZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RNMN

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


FLDZ
FLDZ Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
FLDZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLDZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLDZ Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
FLDZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLDZ Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RNMN vs. FLDZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RiverNorth Market Neutral ETF (RNMN) and RiverNorth Patriot ETF (FLDZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RNMNFLDZDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.24

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.74

RNMN vs. FLDZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RNMN vs. FLDZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RNMN drawdown since its inception was 0.00%, smaller than the maximum FLDZ drawdown of -19.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RNMN and FLDZ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RNMNFLDZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

0.00%

-19.54%

+19.54%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.25%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-1.64%

+1.64%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

0.00%

-5.86%

+5.86%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.06%

Volatility

RNMN vs. FLDZ - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RNMNFLDZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.84%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.79%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.79%

RNMN vs. FLDZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

RNMN has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than FLDZ's 0.77% expense ratio.


Dividends

RNMN vs. FLDZ - Dividend Comparison

RNMN has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FLDZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.44%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
FLDZ
RiverNorth Patriot ETF
1.44%1.54%1.17%1.39%1.52%
RNMN
RiverNorth Market Neutral ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


On fees, FLDZ is cheaper at 0.77% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

FLDZ is cheaper with a 0.77% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for RNMN.

FLDZ has the higher dividend yield at 1.44%, compared with 0.00% for RNMN.

RNMN is categorized as Equity Market Neutral, while FLDZ is Mid Cap Blend Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.90% for RNMN and 0.77% for FLDZ.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RNMN and FLDZ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer