RNMBF vs. GLD
RNMBF (Rheinmetall AG) is a stock, while GLD (SPDR Gold Shares) is Gold fund tracking the LBMA Gold Price PM. Over the past 5 years, RNMBF returned 65.24%/yr vs 17.53%/yr for GLD. At a 0.09 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
RNMBF vs. GLD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RNMBF achieves a -40.80% return, which is significantly lower than GLD's -5.72% return.
RNMBF
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- -24.62%
- YTD
- -40.80%
- 6M
- -40.71%
- 1Y
- -49.58%
- 3Y*
- 61.68%
- 5Y*
- 65.24%
- 10Y*
- —
GLD
- 1D
- 1.13%
- 1M
- -8.53%
- YTD
- -5.72%
- 6M
- -10.34%
- 1Y
- 21.79%
- 3Y*
- 28.11%
- 5Y*
- 17.53%
- 10Y*
- 11.54%
RNMBF vs. GLD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RNMBF Rheinmetall AG | -40.80% | 189.47% | 106.03% | 62.49% | 112.89% | 16.07% | 8.13% | 0.00% |
GLD SPDR Gold Shares | -5.72% | 63.68% | 26.66% | 12.69% | -0.77% | -4.15% | 24.81% | 0.92% |
Correlation
The correlation between RNMBF and GLD is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 18, 2019 | 0.09 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RNMBF vs. GLD — Risk / Return Rank
RNMBF
GLD
RNMBF vs. GLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rheinmetall AG (RNMBF) and SPDR Gold Shares (GLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RNMBF | GLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.79 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.58 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.83 | 1.17 | -0.34 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.93 | 0.84 | -1.76 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -2.26 | 2.30 | -4.56 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RNMBF vs. GLD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RNMBF drawdown since its inception was -53.57%, which is greater than GLD's maximum drawdown of -45.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RNMBF and GLD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RNMBF | GLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.57% | -45.56% | -8.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -53.57% | -26.21% | -27.36% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -53.57% | -26.21% | -27.36% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -53.57% | -26.21% | -27.36% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -26.21% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -53.54% | -24.66% | -28.88% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.07% | -16.17% | +7.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 21.98% | 9.50% | +12.48% |
Volatility
RNMBF vs. GLD - Volatility Comparison
Rheinmetall AG (RNMBF) has a higher volatility of 22.56% compared to SPDR Gold Shares (GLD) at 8.81%. This indicates that RNMBF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RNMBF | GLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 22.56% | 8.81% | +13.75% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 41.64% | 24.47% | +17.17% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 50.07% | 27.73% | +22.34% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 50.46% | 18.30% | +32.16% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 49.16% | 16.07% | +33.09% |
Dividends
RNMBF vs. GLD - Dividend Comparison
RNMBF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.26%, while GLD has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLD SPDR Gold Shares | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RNMBF Rheinmetall AG | 1.26% | 1.48% | 1.92% | 2.96% | 3.43% | 19.20% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RNMBF and GLD have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RNMBF has higher volatility (22.56%) compared to GLD (8.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RNMBF dropped -53.57% vs GLD's -45.56%.
GLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.79 vs -1.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RNMBF and GLD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer