RND vs. SCHK

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

RND (First Trust Bloomberg R&D Leaders ETF) and SCHK (Schwab 1000 Index ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds - RND tracks the Bloomberg R&D Leaders Select Index while SCHK tracks the Schwab 1000 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, RND returned 20.03% vs 23.67% for SCHK. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. RND charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for SCHK.

Performance

RND vs. SCHK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Bloomberg R&D Leaders ETF (RND) and Schwab 1000 Index ETF (SCHK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RND achieves a 1.67% return, which is significantly lower than SCHK's 8.54% return.

RND

• 1D: -1.59%
• 1M: -2.84%
• YTD: 1.67%
• 6M: 0.70%
• 1Y: 20.03%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

SCHK

• 1D: -1.42%
• 1M: -0.95%
• YTD: 8.54%
• 6M: 7.46%
• 1Y: 23.67%
• 3Y*: 20.74%
• 5Y*: 12.31%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RND vs. SCHK - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
RND First Trust Bloomberg R&D Leaders ETF	1.67%	22.38%	26.88%
SCHK Schwab 1000 Index ETF	8.54%	17.23%	17.83%

Correlation

The correlation between RND and SCHK is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.92
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 1, 2024	0.92

The correlation between RND and SCHK has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

RND vs. SCHK - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	RND	SCHK
Technology	47.2%	38.0%
Consumer Cyclical	15.7%	9.8%
Communication Services	13.4%	10.1%
Healthcare	13.3%	8.4%
Industrials	7.4%	8.9%
Consumer Defensive	1.2%	4.3%
Financial Services	1.1%	11.2%
Basic Materials	0.9%	1.9%
Energy	-	3.2%
Real Estate	-	2.0%
Utilities	-	2.1%

Return for Risk

RND vs. SCHK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RND

RND Risk / Return Rank: 34
RND Sharpe Ratio Rank: 37
RND Sortino Ratio Rank: 35
RND Omega Ratio Rank: 35
RND Calmar Ratio Rank: 28
RND Martin Ratio Rank: 33

SCHK

SCHK Risk / Return Rank: 58
SCHK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 57
SCHK Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
SCHK Omega Ratio Rank: 56
SCHK Calmar Ratio Rank: 56
SCHK Martin Ratio Rank: 67

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RND vs. SCHK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Bloomberg R&D Leaders ETF (RND) and Schwab 1000 Index ETF (SCHK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	RND	SCHK	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.22	1.86	-0.64
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.71	2.53	-0.82
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.22	1.33	-0.12
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.29	2.65	-1.36
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.58	11.81	-7.24

RND vs. SCHK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RND Sharpe Ratio is 1.22, which is lower than the SCHK Sharpe Ratio of 1.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RND and SCHK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

RND vs. SCHK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RND drawdown since its inception was -23.52%, smaller than the maximum SCHK drawdown of -34.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RND and SCHK.

Drawdown Indicators

	RND	SCHK	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-23.52%	-34.80%	+11.28%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.56%	-8.97%	-6.59%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-19.21%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-25.44%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.30%	-2.98%	-2.32%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.71%	-5.16%	+1.45%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.39%	2.01%	+2.38%

Volatility

RND vs. SCHK - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Bloomberg R&D Leaders ETF (RND) has a higher volatility of 6.27% compared to Schwab 1000 Index ETF (SCHK) at 4.96%. This indicates that RND's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RND	SCHK	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.27%	4.96%	+1.31%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.84%	10.10%	+2.74%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.55%	12.84%	+3.71%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.27%	17.34%	+3.93%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.27%	19.12%	+2.15%

RND vs. SCHK - Expense Ratio Comparison

RND has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHK's 0.03% expense ratio.

Dividends

RND vs. SCHK - Dividend Comparison

RND has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SCHK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.03%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
RND First Trust Bloomberg R&D Leaders ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.04%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SCHK Schwab 1000 Index ETF	1.03%	1.09%	1.20%	1.38%	1.57%	1.17%	1.58%	1.82%	1.80%	0.31%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RND and SCHK in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.92, RND and SCHK move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, RND or SCHK?

RND has higher volatility (6.27%) compared to SCHK (4.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RND dropped -23.52% vs SCHK's -34.80%.

Which ETF is better, RND or SCHK?

On 1-year performance, SCHK leads with 23.67% vs 20.03% for RND. On fees, SCHK is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, SCHK has been the lower-risk option at 4.96%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, RND or SCHK?

Over the 1-year period, SCHK has performed better with a 23.67% return vs 20.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, RND or SCHK?

SCHK is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for RND.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, RND or SCHK?

SCHK has the higher dividend yield at 1.03%, compared with 0.00% for RND.

What is the main difference between RND and SCHK?

RND tracks Bloomberg R&D Leaders Select Index, while SCHK tracks Schwab 1000 Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for RND and 0.03% for SCHK.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SCHK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.86 vs 1.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.