PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RMRC vs. YCLO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RMRC vs. YCLO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ARMOR Core Risk-Managed ETF (RMRC) and Franklin BSP CLO ETF (YCLO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


RMRC

1D
-0.80%
1M
0.46%
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*

YCLO

1D
0.00%
1M
0.59%
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$203.42K$116.31K$156.01K
$9.14K$4.49K$2.97K

RMRC vs. YCLO - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between RMRC and YCLO is -0.02, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 4, 2026

-0.02

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RMRC vs. YCLO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ARMOR Core Risk-Managed ETF (RMRC) and Franklin BSP CLO ETF (YCLO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

RMRC vs. YCLO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RMRC vs. YCLO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RMRC drawdown since its inception was -6.57%, which is greater than YCLO's maximum drawdown of -0.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RMRC and YCLO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RMRCYCLODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-6.57%

-0.04%

-6.53%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.80%

0.00%

-0.80%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.56%

0.00%

-1.56%

Volatility

RMRC vs. YCLO - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RMRCYCLODifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.17%

0.43%

+9.74%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.17%

0.43%

+9.74%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.17%

0.43%

+9.74%

RMRC vs. YCLO - Expense Ratio Comparison

RMRC has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than YCLO's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

RMRC vs. YCLO - Dividend Comparison

RMRC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.58%, more than YCLO's 0.31% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


RMRC and YCLO have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, YCLO is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

YCLO is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for RMRC.

RMRC has the higher dividend yield at 0.58%, compared with 0.31% for YCLO.

RMRC is categorized as Actively Managed, while YCLO is CLO. They also come from different issuers: Exchange Traded Concepts and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for RMRC and 0.35% for YCLO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RMRC and YCLO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer