RMRC vs. ARKG

Last updated Jul 30, 2026

RMRC (ARMOR Core Risk-Managed ETF) and ARKG (ARK Genomic Revolution Multi-Sector ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RMRC is a Actively Managed fund actively managed by Exchange Traded Concepts, while ARKG is a Health & Biotech Equities fund actively managed by ARK. Both are actively managed. Their 0.41 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. RMRC charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for ARKG.

Performance

RMRC vs. ARKG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ARMOR Core Risk-Managed ETF (RMRC) and ARK Genomic Revolution Multi-Sector ETF (ARKG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

RMRC

• 1D: -0.80%
• 1M: 0.46%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

ARKG

• 1D: -0.85%
• 1M: -11.47%
• 6M: 19.12%
• YTD: 29.44%
• 1Y: 52.32%
• 3Y*: 0.19%
• 5Y*: -14.86%
• 10Y*: 7.89%
• ALL TIME*: 5.94%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
ARKG ARK Genomic Revolution Multi-Sector ETF	$103.82M	$130.27M	$121.59M
RMRC ARMOR Core Risk-Managed ETF	$203.42K	$116.31K	$156.01K

RMRC vs. ARKG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
RMRC ARMOR Core Risk-Managed ETF	2.77%
ARKG ARK Genomic Revolution Multi-Sector ETF	30.53%

Correlation

The correlation between RMRC and ARKG is 0.41, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 24, 2026	0.41

Return for Risk

RMRC vs. ARKG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

RMRC

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

ARKG

ARKG Risk / Return Rank: 50
ARKG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 50
ARKG Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
ARKG Omega Ratio Rank: 47
ARKG Calmar Ratio Rank: 54
ARKG Martin Ratio Rank: 42

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

RMRC vs. ARKG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ARMOR Core Risk-Managed ETF (RMRC) and ARK Genomic Revolution Multi-Sector ETF (ARKG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	RMRC	ARKG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.23	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	1.92	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.22	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	1.91	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	4.59	—

Drawdowns

RMRC vs. ARKG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RMRC drawdown since its inception was -6.57%, smaller than the maximum ARKG drawdown of -83.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RMRC and ARKG.

Drawdown Indicators

	RMRC	ARKG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-6.57%	-83.59%	+77.02%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-27.51%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-51.74%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-79.26%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-83.59%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.80%	-66.45%	+65.65%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.56%	-36.25%	+34.69%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	11.44%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	RMRC	ARKG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	9.17%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	31.06%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.17%	43.05%	-32.88%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.17%	46.14%	-35.97%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	10.17%	41.42%	-31.25%

RMRC vs. ARKG - Expense Ratio Comparison

RMRC has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than ARKG's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

RMRC vs. ARKG - Dividend Comparison

RMRC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.58%, while ARKG has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
ARKG ARK Genomic Revolution Multi-Sector ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.62%	0.85%	3.14%	0.82%	1.34%
RMRC ARMOR Core Risk-Managed ETF	0.58%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RMRC and ARKG in my portfolio?

RMRC and ARKG have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, RMRC or ARKG?

On fees, RMRC is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, RMRC or ARKG?

RMRC is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for ARKG.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, RMRC or ARKG?

RMRC has the higher dividend yield at 0.58%, compared with 0.00% for ARKG.

What is the main difference between RMRC and ARKG?

RMRC is categorized as Actively Managed, while ARKG is Health & Biotech Equities. They also come from different issuers: Exchange Traded Concepts and ARK. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for RMRC and 0.75% for ARKG.