PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RMR vs. PEP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

RMR vs. PEP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in The RMR Group Inc. (RMR) and PepsiCo, Inc. (PEP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RMR achieves a 47.09% return, which is significantly higher than PEP's 1.07% return. Over the past 10 years, RMR has underperformed PEP with an annualized return of 3.24%, while PEP has yielded a comparatively higher 6.60% annualized return.


RMR

1D
1.67%
1M
2.62%
YTD
47.09%
6M
45.91%
1Y
40.45%
3Y*
5.11%
5Y*
-2.01%
10Y*
3.24%

PEP

1D
0.95%
1M
-4.52%
YTD
1.07%
6M
0.96%
1Y
14.57%
3Y*
-5.31%
5Y*
2.73%
10Y*
6.60%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RMR vs. PEP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RMR
The RMR Group Inc.
47.09%-19.39%-21.50%6.48%-13.93%10.33%-11.24%-11.65%-9.17%53.27%
PEP
PepsiCo, Inc.
1.07%-1.85%-7.60%-3.29%6.78%20.56%11.67%27.38%-4.81%17.82%

Correlation

The correlation between RMR and PEP is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.14

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.23

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.25

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.23

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 15, 2015

0.22

The correlation between RMR and PEP shifts across timeframes, from 0.14 (1 year) to 0.25 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

RMR:

$347.40M

PEP:

$194.75B

EPS

RMR:

$1.38

PEP:

$6.38

PE Ratio

RMR:

15.05

PEP:

22.28

PS Ratio

RMR:

0.54

PEP:

2.04

PB Ratio

RMR:

1.53

PEP:

9.11

Total Revenue (TTM)

RMR:

$640.19M

PEP:

$95.45B

Gross Profit (TTM)

RMR:

$596.04M

PEP:

$51.60B

EBITDA (TTM)

RMR:

$72.59M

PEP:

$15.08B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RMR vs. PEP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RMR
RMR Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
RMR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RMR Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
RMR Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
RMR Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
RMR Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

PEP
PEP Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
PEP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PEP Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
PEP Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
PEP Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
PEP Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RMR vs. PEP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The RMR Group Inc. (RMR) and PepsiCo, Inc. (PEP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RMRPEPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.80

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.06

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.13

+0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.55

0.90

+1.65

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.71

2.17

+3.53

RMR vs. PEP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RMR Sharpe Ratio is 1.47, which is higher than the PEP Sharpe Ratio of 0.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RMR and PEP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RMR vs. PEP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RMR drawdown since its inception was -75.78%, roughly equal to the maximum PEP drawdown of -73.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RMR and PEP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RMRPEPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-75.78%

-73.92%

-1.86%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.91%

-16.25%

+0.34%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-45.01%

-29.17%

-15.84%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-54.38%

-30.32%

-24.06%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-75.78%

-30.32%

-45.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-59.56%

-18.89%

-40.67%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-44.56%

-13.65%

-30.91%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.11%

6.72%

+0.39%

Volatility

RMR vs. PEP - Volatility Comparison

The RMR Group Inc. (RMR) has a higher volatility of 7.04% compared to PepsiCo, Inc. (PEP) at 6.45%. This indicates that RMR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PEP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RMRPEPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.04%

6.45%

+0.59%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.91%

15.02%

+4.89%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.68%

21.86%

+5.82%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.09%

18.43%

+8.66%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

33.30%

19.69%

+13.61%

Dividends

RMR vs. PEP - Dividend Comparison

RMR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.68%, more than PEP's 4.20% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PEP
PepsiCo, Inc.
4.20%3.92%3.51%2.91%2.50%2.45%2.71%2.77%3.25%2.64%2.83%2.76%
RMR
The RMR Group Inc.
8.68%12.08%8.48%5.67%5.59%24.57%3.94%3.13%2.07%1.69%2.02%0.00%

Financials

RMR vs. PEP - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between The RMR Group Inc. and PepsiCo, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.005.00B10.00B15.00B20.00B25.00B30.00B20222023202420252026
145.63M
19.44B
(RMR) Total Revenue
(PEP) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

RMR vs. PEP - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between The RMR Group Inc. and PepsiCo, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%20222023202420252026
74.1%
55.2%
Portfolio components
RMR - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The RMR Group Inc. reported a gross profit of 107.94M and revenue of 145.63M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 74.1%.

PEP - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, PepsiCo, Inc. reported a gross profit of 10.73B and revenue of 19.44B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 55.2%.

RMR - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The RMR Group Inc. reported an operating income of 7.04M and revenue of 145.63M, resulting in an operating margin of 4.8%.

PEP - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, PepsiCo, Inc. reported an operating income of 3.21B and revenue of 19.44B, resulting in an operating margin of 16.5%.

RMR - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The RMR Group Inc. reported a net income of 3.24M and revenue of 145.63M, resulting in a net margin of 2.2%.

PEP - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, PepsiCo, Inc. reported a net income of 2.34B and revenue of 19.44B, resulting in a net margin of 12.0%.


Frequently Asked Questions


RMR and PEP have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RMR has higher volatility (7.04%) compared to PEP (6.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RMR dropped -75.78% vs PEP's -73.92%.

RMR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.47 vs 0.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RMR and PEP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer