RMQAX vs. RYGBX
Compare and contrast key facts about Rydex Monthly Rebalance NASDAQ-100 2x Strategy Fund (RMQAX) and Rydex Government Long Bond 1.2x Strategy Fund (RYGBX).
RMQAX is managed by Rydex Funds. It was launched on Nov 27, 2014. RYGBX is managed by Rydex Funds. It was launched on Jan 2, 1994.
Performance
RMQAX vs. RYGBX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
RMQAX vs. RYGBX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RMQAX Rydex Monthly Rebalance NASDAQ-100 2x Strategy Fund | -12.98% | 33.92% | 44.76% | 115.91% | -59.93% | 56.36% | 101.06% | 80.80% | -7.28% | 69.80% |
RYGBX Rydex Government Long Bond 1.2x Strategy Fund | -1.11% | 2.19% | -12.81% | -1.05% | -40.90% | -7.28% | 21.93% | 17.50% | -5.20% | 9.93% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RMQAX achieves a -12.98% return, which is significantly lower than RYGBX's -1.11% return. Over the past 10 years, RMQAX has outperformed RYGBX with an annualized return of 31.08%, while RYGBX has yielded a comparatively lower -4.33% annualized return.
RMQAX
- 1D
- 7.46%
- 1M
- -10.36%
- YTD
- -12.98%
- 6M
- -11.16%
- 1Y
- 39.20%
- 3Y*
- 37.10%
- 5Y*
- 16.39%
- 10Y*
- 31.08%
RYGBX
- 1D
- -0.17%
- 1M
- -4.16%
- YTD
- -1.11%
- 6M
- -2.44%
- 1Y
- -4.34%
- 3Y*
- -6.59%
- 5Y*
- -10.30%
- 10Y*
- -4.33%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
RMQAX vs. RYGBX - Expense Ratio Comparison
RMQAX has a 1.32% expense ratio, which is higher than RYGBX's 0.99% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
RMQAX vs. RYGBX — Risk / Return Rank
RMQAX
RYGBX
RMQAX vs. RYGBX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rydex Monthly Rebalance NASDAQ-100 2x Strategy Fund (RMQAX) and Rydex Government Long Bond 1.2x Strategy Fund (RYGBX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RMQAX | RYGBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.87 | -0.25 | +1.12 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.54 | -0.25 | +1.78 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 0.97 | +0.25 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.65 | -0.17 | +1.81 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.66 | -0.32 | +5.98 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RMQAX | RYGBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.87 | -0.25 | +1.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.36 | -0.52 | +0.88 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.67 | -0.22 | +0.90 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.64 | 0.08 | +0.56 |
Correlation
The correlation between RMQAX and RYGBX is -0.10. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.
Dividends
RMQAX vs. RYGBX - Dividend Comparison
RMQAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 41.68%, more than RYGBX's 3.51% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RMQAX Rydex Monthly Rebalance NASDAQ-100 2x Strategy Fund | 41.68% | 36.27% | 26.02% | 3.76% | 0.00% | 2.18% | 5.30% | 0.10% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RYGBX Rydex Government Long Bond 1.2x Strategy Fund | 3.51% | 3.59% | 2.89% | 2.70% | 1.69% | 0.71% | 46.47% | 5.00% | 1.51% | 1.45% | 5.62% | 2.07% |
Drawdowns
RMQAX vs. RYGBX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RMQAX drawdown since its inception was -63.18%, roughly equal to the maximum RYGBX drawdown of -62.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RMQAX and RYGBX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| RMQAX | RYGBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.18% | -62.42% | -0.76% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -25.11% | -11.73% | -13.38% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -63.18% | -55.36% | -7.82% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -63.18% | -62.42% | -0.76% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -19.36% | -58.85% | +39.49% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.05% | -19.31% | +6.26% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.30% | 6.15% | +1.15% |
Volatility
RMQAX vs. RYGBX - Volatility Comparison
Rydex Monthly Rebalance NASDAQ-100 2x Strategy Fund (RMQAX) has a higher volatility of 13.71% compared to Rydex Government Long Bond 1.2x Strategy Fund (RYGBX) at 4.24%. This indicates that RMQAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RYGBX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| RMQAX | RYGBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.71% | 4.24% | +9.47% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 26.24% | 7.69% | +18.55% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 47.80% | 13.47% | +34.33% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 46.26% | 19.83% | +26.43% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 46.34% | 19.36% | +26.98% |