PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RMQAX vs. RYCKX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RMQAX vs. RYCKX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Rydex Monthly Rebalance NASDAQ-100 2x Strategy Fund (RMQAX) and Rydex S&P MidCap 400 Pure Growth Fund (RYCKX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RMQAX achieves a 40.14% return, which is significantly higher than RYCKX's 20.27% return. Over the past 10 years, RMQAX has outperformed RYCKX with an annualized return of 37.61%, while RYCKX has yielded a comparatively lower 8.17% annualized return.


RMQAX

1D
0.94%
1M
21.45%
YTD
40.14%
6M
35.70%
1Y
83.47%
3Y*
51.18%
5Y*
27.34%
10Y*
37.61%

RYCKX

1D
0.61%
1M
6.36%
YTD
20.27%
6M
19.77%
1Y
29.41%
3Y*
17.75%
5Y*
6.37%
10Y*
8.17%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RMQAX vs. RYCKX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RMQAX
Rydex Monthly Rebalance NASDAQ-100 2x Strategy Fund
40.14%33.92%44.76%115.91%-59.93%56.36%101.06%80.80%-7.28%69.80%
RYCKX
Rydex S&P MidCap 400 Pure Growth Fund
20.27%6.61%15.10%13.97%-23.05%11.26%29.72%14.60%-15.17%18.02%

Correlation

The correlation between RMQAX and RYCKX is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.69

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.66

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.74

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.74

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2015

0.75

The correlation between RMQAX and RYCKX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.66 to 0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RMQAX vs. RYCKX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RMQAX
RMQAX Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
RMQAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RMQAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
RMQAX Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
RMQAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
RMQAX Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

RYCKX
RYCKX Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
RYCKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RYCKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
RYCKX Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
RYCKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
RYCKX Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RMQAX vs. RYCKX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rydex Monthly Rebalance NASDAQ-100 2x Strategy Fund (RMQAX) and Rydex S&P MidCap 400 Pure Growth Fund (RYCKX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RMQAXRYCKXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.70

1.69

+1.01

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.16

2.43

+0.73

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.29

+0.12

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.48

2.95

+0.53

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

12.58

11.86

+0.72

RMQAX vs. RYCKX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RMQAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.70, which is higher than the RYCKX Sharpe Ratio of 1.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RMQAX and RYCKX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RMQAXRYCKXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.70

1.69

+1.01

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.60

0.28

+0.31

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.81

0.36

+0.46

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.75

0.35

+0.40

Drawdowns

RMQAX vs. RYCKX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RMQAX drawdown since its inception was -63.18%, which is greater than RYCKX's maximum drawdown of -52.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RMQAX and RYCKX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RMQAXRYCKXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.18%

-52.60%

-10.58%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-24.96%

-10.50%

-14.46%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-42.45%

-27.14%

-15.31%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-63.18%

-35.98%

-27.20%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-63.18%

-44.75%

-18.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.90%

-9.52%

-3.38%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.89%

2.60%

+4.29%

Volatility

RMQAX vs. RYCKX - Volatility Comparison

Rydex Monthly Rebalance NASDAQ-100 2x Strategy Fund (RMQAX) has a higher volatility of 8.58% compared to Rydex S&P MidCap 400 Pure Growth Fund (RYCKX) at 6.42%. This indicates that RMQAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RYCKX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RMQAXRYCKXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.58%

6.42%

+2.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.32%

14.65%

+9.67%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

32.15%

18.34%

+13.81%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

46.19%

22.78%

+23.41%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

46.42%

23.06%

+23.36%

RMQAX vs. RYCKX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RMQAX has a 1.32% expense ratio, which is lower than RYCKX's 2.26% expense ratio.


Dividends

RMQAX vs. RYCKX - Dividend Comparison

RMQAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 25.88%, while RYCKX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RMQAX
Rydex Monthly Rebalance NASDAQ-100 2x Strategy Fund
25.88%36.27%26.02%3.76%0.00%2.18%5.30%0.10%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
RYCKX
Rydex S&P MidCap 400 Pure Growth Fund
0.00%0.00%20.92%0.00%14.34%13.66%1.29%0.00%18.93%7.60%1.72%5.90%

Frequently Asked Questions


RMQAX and RYCKX have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RMQAX has higher volatility (8.58%) compared to RYCKX (6.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RMQAX dropped -63.18% vs RYCKX's -52.60%.

RMQAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.70 vs 1.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RMQAX and RYCKX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer