RMQAX vs. CNPIX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

RMQAX (Rydex Monthly Rebalance NASDAQ-100 2x Strategy Fund) and CNPIX (ProFunds Consumer Goods UltraSector Fund) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, RMQAX returned 37.61%/yr vs 13.51%/yr for CNPIX. A 0.57 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. RMQAX charges 1.32%/yr vs 1.78%/yr for CNPIX.

Performance

RMQAX vs. CNPIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Rydex Monthly Rebalance NASDAQ-100 2x Strategy Fund (RMQAX) and ProFunds Consumer Goods UltraSector Fund (CNPIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RMQAX achieves a 40.14% return, which is significantly higher than CNPIX's 6.47% return. Over the past 10 years, RMQAX has outperformed CNPIX with an annualized return of 37.61%, while CNPIX has yielded a comparatively lower 13.51% annualized return.

RMQAX

• 1D: 0.94%
• 1M: 21.45%
• YTD: 40.14%
• 6M: 35.70%
• 1Y: 83.47%
• 3Y*: 51.18%
• 5Y*: 27.34%
• 10Y*: 37.61%

CNPIX

• 1D: -0.32%
• 1M: -3.41%
• YTD: 6.47%
• 6M: 5.02%
• 1Y: -3.00%
• 3Y*: 3.93%
• 5Y*: -1.77%
• 10Y*: 13.51%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RMQAX vs. CNPIX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
RMQAX Rydex Monthly Rebalance NASDAQ-100 2x Strategy Fund	40.14%	33.92%	44.76%	115.91%	-59.93%	56.36%	101.06%	80.80%	-7.28%	69.80%
CNPIX ProFunds Consumer Goods UltraSector Fund	6.47%	-3.43%	12.77%	2.93%	-36.57%	26.52%	188.12%	40.51%	-22.66%	20.89%

Correlation

The correlation between RMQAX and CNPIX is -0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.07
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.12
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.44
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.54
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2015	0.57

The correlation between RMQAX and CNPIX shifts across timeframes, from -0.07 (1 year) to 0.57 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

RMQAX vs. CNPIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RMQAX

RMQAX Risk / Return Rank: 67
RMQAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
RMQAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
RMQAX Omega Ratio Rank: 56
RMQAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 76
RMQAX Martin Ratio Rank: 64

CNPIX

CNPIX Risk / Return Rank: 2
CNPIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
CNPIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
CNPIX Omega Ratio Rank: 2
CNPIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
CNPIX Martin Ratio Rank: 2

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RMQAX vs. CNPIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rydex Monthly Rebalance NASDAQ-100 2x Strategy Fund (RMQAX) and ProFunds Consumer Goods UltraSector Fund (CNPIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	RMQAX	CNPIX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.70	-0.17	+2.87
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.16	-0.11	+3.27
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.41	0.99	+0.43
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.48	-0.22	+3.70
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	12.58	-0.40	+12.98
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

RMQAX vs. CNPIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RMQAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.70, which is higher than the CNPIX Sharpe Ratio of -0.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RMQAX and CNPIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	RMQAX	CNPIX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.70	-0.17	+2.87
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.60	-0.07	+0.67
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.81	0.34	+0.48
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.75	0.37	+0.38

Drawdowns

RMQAX vs. CNPIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RMQAX drawdown since its inception was -63.18%, which is greater than CNPIX's maximum drawdown of -60.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RMQAX and CNPIX.

Drawdown Indicators

	RMQAX	CNPIX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-63.18%	-60.04%	-3.14%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-24.96%	-14.47%	-10.49%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-42.45%	-19.04%	-23.41%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-63.18%	-45.40%	-17.78%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-63.18%	-46.56%	-16.62%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-28.17%	+28.17%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-12.90%	-12.95%	+0.05%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.89%	7.93%	-1.04%

Volatility

RMQAX vs. CNPIX - Volatility Comparison

Rydex Monthly Rebalance NASDAQ-100 2x Strategy Fund (RMQAX) has a higher volatility of 8.58% compared to ProFunds Consumer Goods UltraSector Fund (CNPIX) at 5.97%. This indicates that RMQAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CNPIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RMQAX	CNPIX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.58%	5.97%	+2.61%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	24.32%	14.72%	+9.60%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	32.15%	18.83%	+13.32%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	46.19%	23.71%	+22.48%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	46.42%	40.43%	+5.99%

RMQAX vs. CNPIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RMQAX has a 1.32% expense ratio, which is lower than CNPIX's 1.78% expense ratio.

Dividends

RMQAX vs. CNPIX - Dividend Comparison

RMQAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 25.88%, more than CNPIX's 0.57% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CNPIX ProFunds Consumer Goods UltraSector Fund	0.57%	0.60%	1.55%	1.59%	0.00%	1.45%	0.00%	2.77%	1.64%	0.07%	0.00%	0.50%
RMQAX Rydex Monthly Rebalance NASDAQ-100 2x Strategy Fund	25.88%	36.27%	26.02%	3.76%	0.00%	2.18%	5.30%	0.10%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RMQAX and CNPIX in my portfolio?

RMQAX and CNPIX have a correlation of -0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, RMQAX or CNPIX?

RMQAX has higher volatility (8.58%) compared to CNPIX (5.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RMQAX dropped -63.18% vs CNPIX's -60.04%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RMQAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.70 vs -0.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.