RMM vs. NPCT
RMM (Rivernorth Managed Duration Municipal Income Fund Inc.) is a stock, while NPCT (Nuveen Core Plus Impact Fund) is Intermediate Core-Plus Bond fund actively managed by Nuveen. Over the past 5 years, RMM returned 0.47%/yr vs -3.02%/yr for NPCT. At a 0.32 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
RMM vs. NPCT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RMM achieves a 9.72% return, which is significantly higher than NPCT's 3.14% return.
RMM
- 1D
- 0.62%
- 1M
- 2.96%
- YTD
- 9.72%
- 6M
- 8.06%
- 1Y
- 14.51%
- 3Y*
- 5.30%
- 5Y*
- 0.47%
- 10Y*
- —
NPCT
- 1D
- -0.30%
- 1M
- -4.30%
- YTD
- 3.14%
- 6M
- 0.97%
- 1Y
- 2.64%
- 3Y*
- 12.37%
- 5Y*
- -3.02%
- 10Y*
- —
RMM vs. NPCT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RMM Rivernorth Managed Duration Municipal Income Fund Inc. | 9.72% | 2.01% | 9.25% | 5.93% | -23.45% | 5.17% |
NPCT Nuveen Core Plus Impact Fund | 3.14% | 9.87% | 17.23% | 7.78% | -37.50% | -4.98% |
Correlation
The correlation between RMM and NPCT is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 29, 2021 | 0.32 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RMM vs. NPCT — Risk / Return Rank
RMM
NPCT
RMM vs. NPCT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rivernorth Managed Duration Municipal Income Fund Inc. (RMM) and Nuveen Core Plus Impact Fund (NPCT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RMM | NPCT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.33 | 0.27 | +1.06 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.11 | 0.48 | +1.63 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.06 | +0.19 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.78 | 0.80 | +0.98 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.18 | 2.03 | +4.15 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RMM | NPCT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.33 | 0.27 | +1.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.03 | -0.23 | +0.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.11 | -0.24 | +0.35 |
Drawdowns
RMM vs. NPCT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RMM drawdown since its inception was -35.99%, smaller than the maximum NPCT drawdown of -46.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RMM and NPCT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RMM | NPCT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.99% | -46.77% | +10.78% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.90% | -6.79% | -1.11% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.16% | -12.59% | -7.57% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.29% | -46.77% | +13.48% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.68% | -16.26% | +10.58% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.80% | -25.24% | +11.44% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.28% | 2.68% | -0.40% |
Volatility
RMM vs. NPCT - Volatility Comparison
Rivernorth Managed Duration Municipal Income Fund Inc. (RMM) has a higher volatility of 4.57% compared to Nuveen Core Plus Impact Fund (NPCT) at 3.18%. This indicates that RMM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NPCT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RMM | NPCT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.57% | 3.18% | +1.39% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.16% | 7.09% | +2.07% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.95% | 10.15% | +0.80% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.48% | 13.11% | +1.37% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.90% | 13.07% | +4.83% |
Dividends
RMM vs. NPCT - Dividend Comparison
RMM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.29%, less than NPCT's 12.38% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NPCT Nuveen Core Plus Impact Fund | 12.38% | 13.15% | 12.20% | 10.28% | 11.93% | 3.94% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RMM Rivernorth Managed Duration Municipal Income Fund Inc. | 7.29% | 7.98% | 7.63% | 7.71% | 7.74% | 5.46% | 6.18% | 1.90% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RMM and NPCT have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RMM has higher volatility (4.57%) compared to NPCT (3.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RMM dropped -35.99% vs NPCT's -46.77%.
RMM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.33 vs 0.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RMM and NPCT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer