PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RMLVX vs. AVEFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RMLVX vs. AVEFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Russell Investments LifePoints Moderate Strategy Fund (RMLVX) and Ave Maria Bond Fund (AVEFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RMLVX achieves a 5.11% return, which is significantly higher than AVEFX's 1.84% return. Over the past 10 years, RMLVX has outperformed AVEFX with an annualized return of 4.08%, while AVEFX has yielded a comparatively lower 3.78% annualized return.


RMLVX

1D
0.57%
1M
0.30%
6M
3.40%
YTD
5.11%
1Y
10.40%
3Y*
9.22%
5Y*
3.35%
10Y*
4.08%
ALL TIME*
2.26%

AVEFX

1D
0.16%
1M
0.00%
6M
-0.15%
YTD
1.84%
1Y
3.41%
3Y*
5.63%
5Y*
2.97%
10Y*
3.78%
ALL TIME*
4.10%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

RMLVX vs. AVEFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RMLVX
Russell Investments LifePoints Moderate Strategy Fund
5.11%11.85%6.00%10.66%-15.32%8.08%3.06%10.54%-4.74%8.24%
AVEFX
Ave Maria Bond Fund
1.84%5.63%5.71%5.16%-2.84%4.38%5.60%8.30%0.41%4.16%

Correlation

The correlation between RMLVX and AVEFX is 0.54, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.54

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.68

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.75

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.70

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 6, 2003

0.70

The correlation between RMLVX and AVEFX shifts across timeframes, from 0.54 (1 year) to 0.75 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RMLVX vs. AVEFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

RMLVX
RMLVX Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
RMLVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RMLVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
RMLVX Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
RMLVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
RMLVX Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

AVEFX
AVEFX Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
AVEFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AVEFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
AVEFX Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
AVEFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
AVEFX Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

RMLVX vs. AVEFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Russell Investments LifePoints Moderate Strategy Fund (RMLVX) and Ave Maria Bond Fund (AVEFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RMLVXAVEFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.59

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.78

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.21

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.13

1.30

+0.83

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.16

2.94

+6.22

RMLVX vs. AVEFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RMLVX Sharpe Ratio is 1.79, which is higher than the AVEFX Sharpe Ratio of 1.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RMLVX and AVEFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RMLVX vs. AVEFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RMLVX drawdown since its inception was -40.56%, which is greater than AVEFX's maximum drawdown of -10.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RMLVX and AVEFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RMLVXAVEFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.56%

-10.24%

-30.32%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.28%

-2.83%

-2.45%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.35%

-2.83%

-4.52%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.83%

-7.57%

-13.26%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-20.83%

-10.24%

-10.59%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.19%

-1.74%

+1.55%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.10%

-0.98%

-5.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.22%

1.25%

-0.03%

Volatility

RMLVX vs. AVEFX - Volatility Comparison

Russell Investments LifePoints Moderate Strategy Fund (RMLVX) has a higher volatility of 1.86% compared to Ave Maria Bond Fund (AVEFX) at 1.04%. This indicates that RMLVX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AVEFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RMLVXAVEFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.86%

1.04%

+0.82%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.33%

2.40%

+2.93%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.28%

3.05%

+3.23%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.04%

4.14%

+3.90%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.74%

4.03%

+3.71%

RMLVX vs. AVEFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RMLVX has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is higher than AVEFX's 0.41% expense ratio.


Dividends

RMLVX vs. AVEFX - Dividend Comparison

RMLVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.08%, less than AVEFX's 3.37% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AVEFX
Ave Maria Bond Fund
3.37%3.51%2.94%2.47%3.59%2.32%2.43%3.31%3.21%2.04%2.94%1.89%
RMLVX
Russell Investments LifePoints Moderate Strategy Fund
3.08%3.10%1.75%1.24%3.84%10.02%1.07%3.80%4.46%3.06%8.20%14.07%

Frequently Asked Questions


RMLVX and AVEFX have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RMLVX has higher volatility (1.86%) compared to AVEFX (1.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RMLVX dropped -40.56% vs AVEFX's -10.24%.

RMLVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.79 vs 1.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RMLVX and AVEFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer