RMLPX vs. CSUAX

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

RMLPX (Recurrent MLP & Infrastructure Fund) and CSUAX (Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A) are both Infrastructure Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, RMLPX returned 27.53%/yr vs 7.33%/yr for CSUAX. Their 0.51 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. RMLPX charges 1.25%/yr vs 1.22%/yr for CSUAX.

Performance

RMLPX vs. CSUAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Recurrent MLP & Infrastructure Fund (RMLPX) and Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (CSUAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RMLPX achieves a 39.36% return, which is significantly higher than CSUAX's 12.43% return.

RMLPX

• 1D: 0.60%
• 1M: 7.98%
• 6M: 27.09%
• YTD: 39.36%
• 1Y: 45.90%
• 3Y*: 28.04%
• 5Y*: 27.53%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 14.04%

CSUAX

• 1D: 0.15%
• 1M: 0.08%
• 6M: 8.01%
• YTD: 12.43%
• 1Y: 17.62%
• 3Y*: 11.66%
• 5Y*: 7.33%
• 10Y*: 7.23%
• ALL TIME*: 9.26%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
CSUAX Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
RMLPX Recurrent MLP & Infrastructure Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

RMLPX vs. CSUAX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
RMLPX Recurrent MLP & Infrastructure Fund	39.36%	8.98%	30.03%	16.79%	35.03%	42.56%	-28.37%	15.33%	-15.93%
CSUAX Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A	12.43%	14.30%	8.30%	2.09%	-5.20%	16.24%	-1.65%	24.26%	-5.83%

Correlation

The correlation between RMLPX and CSUAX is 0.38, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.38
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.46
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.50
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2018	0.51

The correlation between RMLPX and CSUAX shifts across timeframes, from 0.38 (1 year) to 0.51 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

RMLPX vs. CSUAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

RMLPX

RMLPX Risk / Return Rank: 92
RMLPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
RMLPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 90
RMLPX Omega Ratio Rank: 86
RMLPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
RMLPX Martin Ratio Rank: 91

CSUAX

CSUAX Risk / Return Rank: 79
CSUAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 78
CSUAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
CSUAX Omega Ratio Rank: 74
CSUAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
CSUAX Martin Ratio Rank: 80

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

RMLPX vs. CSUAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Recurrent MLP & Infrastructure Fund (RMLPX) and Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (CSUAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	RMLPX	CSUAX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.58	1.81	+0.77
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.40	2.61	+0.80
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.43	1.32	+0.11
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.88	3.07	+1.81
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.01	9.66	+3.35

RMLPX vs. CSUAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RMLPX Sharpe Ratio is 2.58, which is higher than the CSUAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RMLPX and CSUAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

RMLPX vs. CSUAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RMLPX drawdown since its inception was -66.95%, which is greater than CSUAX's maximum drawdown of -52.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RMLPX and CSUAX.

Drawdown Indicators

	RMLPX	CSUAX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-66.95%	-52.20%	-14.75%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.09%	-5.99%	-3.10%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.75%	-11.83%	-6.92%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-22.83%	-20.45%	-2.38%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-35.05%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.18%	-1.65%	-0.53%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.14%	-8.39%	-1.75%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.40%	1.89%	+1.51%

Volatility

RMLPX vs. CSUAX - Volatility Comparison

Recurrent MLP & Infrastructure Fund (RMLPX) has a higher volatility of 6.09% compared to Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (CSUAX) at 3.00%. This indicates that RMLPX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSUAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RMLPX	CSUAX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.09%	3.00%	+3.09%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.14%	8.16%	+5.98%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.19%	10.12%	+7.07%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.25%	13.00%	+8.25%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	27.92%	14.88%	+13.04%

RMLPX vs. CSUAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RMLPX has a 1.25% expense ratio, which is higher than CSUAX's 1.22% expense ratio.

Dividends

RMLPX vs. CSUAX - Dividend Comparison

RMLPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.67%, less than CSUAX's 7.61% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CSUAX Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A	7.61%	8.09%	2.23%	2.17%	3.55%	2.95%	1.30%	1.52%	2.08%	5.00%	2.04%	6.20%
RMLPX Recurrent MLP & Infrastructure Fund	4.67%	6.38%	7.63%	6.49%	7.08%	8.89%	13.48%	7.25%	5.85%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RMLPX and CSUAX in my portfolio?

RMLPX and CSUAX have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, RMLPX or CSUAX?

RMLPX has higher volatility (6.09%) compared to CSUAX (3.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RMLPX dropped -66.95% vs CSUAX's -52.20%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RMLPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.58 vs 1.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.