PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RMI vs. NMS
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

RMI vs. NMS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in RiverNorth Opportunistic Municipal Income Fund (RMI) and Nuveen Minnesota Quality Municipal Income Fund (NMS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

RMI vs. NMS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
RMI
RiverNorth Opportunistic Municipal Income Fund
7.10%2.67%6.30%0.19%-21.34%14.86%0.62%19.27%0.55%
NMS
Nuveen Minnesota Quality Municipal Income Fund
5.76%2.10%19.59%1.57%-21.89%5.47%5.80%25.72%0.43%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RMI achieves a 7.10% return, which is significantly higher than NMS's 5.76% return.


RMI

1D
1.48%
1M
-5.16%
YTD
7.10%
6M
6.88%
1Y
8.91%
3Y*
3.97%
5Y*
0.35%
10Y*

NMS

1D
1.12%
1M
0.47%
YTD
5.76%
6M
5.82%
1Y
9.04%
3Y*
6.52%
5Y*
1.26%
10Y*
2.13%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


RMI vs. NMS - Expense Ratio Comparison

RMI has a 4.92% expense ratio, which is higher than NMS's 0.03% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

RMI vs. NMS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RMI
RMI Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
RMI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RMI Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
RMI Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
RMI Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
RMI Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank

NMS
NMS Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
NMS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NMS Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
NMS Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
NMS Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
NMS Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RMI vs. NMS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RiverNorth Opportunistic Municipal Income Fund (RMI) and Nuveen Minnesota Quality Municipal Income Fund (NMS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RMINMSDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.80

1.01

-0.22

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.16

1.44

-0.29

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.20

-0.04

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.11

1.78

-0.66

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

2.83

3.74

-0.91

RMI vs. NMS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RMI Sharpe Ratio is 0.80, which is comparable to the NMS Sharpe Ratio of 1.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RMI and NMS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RMINMSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.80

1.01

-0.22

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.02

0.09

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.15

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.21

0.22

-0.01

Correlation

The correlation between RMI and NMS is 0.22, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

RMI vs. NMS - Dividend Comparison

RMI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.42%, more than NMS's 6.83% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RMI
RiverNorth Opportunistic Municipal Income Fund
7.42%7.92%7.69%7.67%7.63%10.25%6.03%4.85%0.46%0.00%0.00%0.00%
NMS
Nuveen Minnesota Quality Municipal Income Fund
6.83%7.29%6.05%4.03%5.24%4.19%3.93%4.05%5.52%5.20%4.68%5.60%

Drawdowns

RMI vs. NMS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RMI drawdown since its inception was -32.73%, smaller than the maximum NMS drawdown of -38.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RMI and NMS.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


RMINMSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.73%

-38.76%

+6.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.22%

-5.07%

-2.15%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.73%

-38.76%

+6.03%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.76%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.00%

-5.09%

-2.91%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.15%

-10.81%

-0.34%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.84%

2.41%

+0.43%

Volatility

RMI vs. NMS - Volatility Comparison

RiverNorth Opportunistic Municipal Income Fund (RMI) has a higher volatility of 5.52% compared to Nuveen Minnesota Quality Municipal Income Fund (NMS) at 2.88%. This indicates that RMI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NMS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


RMINMSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.52%

2.88%

+2.64%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.09%

5.95%

+2.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.22%

8.95%

+2.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.95%

14.10%

+1.85%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.08%

14.63%

+1.45%