PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RMGSX vs. IPIRX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RMGSX vs. IPIRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Russell Investments Multi-Asset Growth Strategy Fund (RMGSX) and Voya Global Perspectives Portfolio (IPIRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


RMGSX

1D
-0.95%
1M
-0.79%
YTD
6.26%
6M
5.99%
1Y
15.33%
3Y*
13.24%
5Y*
5.97%
10Y*

IPIRX

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RMGSX vs. IPIRX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RMGSX
Russell Investments Multi-Asset Growth Strategy Fund
6.26%17.38%8.76%15.26%-14.73%7.88%3.14%9.22%-4.92%5.43%
IPIRX
Voya Global Perspectives Portfolio
6.84%14.21%7.31%10.65%-17.52%6.06%16.10%18.35%-9.87%10.10%

Correlation

The correlation between RMGSX and IPIRX is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.77

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.86

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 4, 2017

0.83

The correlation between RMGSX and IPIRX shifts across timeframes, from 0.77 (1 year) to 0.88 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RMGSX vs. IPIRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RMGSX
RMGSX Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
RMGSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RMGSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
RMGSX Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
RMGSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
RMGSX Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank

IPIRX

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RMGSX vs. IPIRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Russell Investments Multi-Asset Growth Strategy Fund (RMGSX) and Voya Global Perspectives Portfolio (IPIRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RMGSXIPIRXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.43

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.42

RMGSX vs. IPIRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RMGSX vs. IPIRX - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RMGSXIPIRXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.93%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.73%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.85%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.20%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.80%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.56%

Volatility

RMGSX vs. IPIRX - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RMGSXIPIRXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.55%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.91%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.28%

RMGSX vs. IPIRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RMGSX has a 0.91% expense ratio, which is higher than IPIRX's 0.20% expense ratio.


Dividends

RMGSX vs. IPIRX - Dividend Comparison

RMGSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.03%, less than IPIRX's 44.20% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IPIRX
Voya Global Perspectives Portfolio
44.20%5.64%3.25%14.65%13.55%6.34%6.25%7.80%1.30%2.78%2.78%7.16%
RMGSX
Russell Investments Multi-Asset Growth Strategy Fund
4.03%4.32%3.60%3.48%0.76%6.27%0.80%3.35%2.46%1.33%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


RMGSX and IPIRX have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RMGSX and IPIRX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer