PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RMBTX vs. KGGAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RMBTX vs. KGGAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in RMB International Fund (RMBTX) and Kopernik Global All-Cap Fund Class A (KGGAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RMBTX achieves a 14.37% return, which is significantly higher than KGGAX's 3.52% return.


RMBTX

1D
0.07%
1M
2.20%
YTD
14.37%
6M
14.27%
1Y
30.53%
3Y*
16.20%
5Y*
8.24%
10Y*

KGGAX

1D
-1.22%
1M
-5.38%
YTD
3.52%
6M
2.71%
1Y
29.20%
3Y*
21.10%
5Y*
10.29%
10Y*
12.37%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RMBTX vs. KGGAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
RMBTX
RMB International Fund
14.37%32.72%0.01%12.94%-16.92%9.52%7.01%19.21%-24.23%
KGGAX
Kopernik Global All-Cap Fund Class A
3.52%64.46%-4.79%13.08%-9.24%16.59%36.89%9.76%-13.47%

Correlation

The correlation between RMBTX and KGGAX is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.57

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.52

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.60

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 12, 2018

0.55

The correlation between RMBTX and KGGAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.52 to 0.60 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RMBTX vs. KGGAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RMBTX
RMBTX Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
RMBTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RMBTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
RMBTX Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
RMBTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
RMBTX Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank

KGGAX
KGGAX Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
KGGAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KGGAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
KGGAX Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
KGGAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
KGGAX Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RMBTX vs. KGGAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RMB International Fund (RMBTX) and Kopernik Global All-Cap Fund Class A (KGGAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RMBTXKGGAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.15

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.35

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.65

2.84

-0.19

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.96

8.10

+1.85

RMBTX vs. KGGAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RMBTX Sharpe Ratio is 1.98, which is comparable to the KGGAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RMBTX and KGGAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RMBTX vs. KGGAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RMBTX drawdown since its inception was -38.70%, smaller than the maximum KGGAX drawdown of -45.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RMBTX and KGGAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RMBTXKGGAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.70%

-45.27%

+6.57%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.95%

-10.63%

-1.32%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.45%

-13.53%

-0.92%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.68%

-26.59%

-2.09%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.90%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-10.40%

+10.40%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.75%

-9.66%

-0.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.17%

3.71%

-0.54%

Volatility

RMBTX vs. KGGAX - Volatility Comparison

RMB International Fund (RMBTX) and Kopernik Global All-Cap Fund Class A (KGGAX) have volatilities of 4.88% and 4.87%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RMBTXKGGAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.88%

4.87%

+0.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.27%

12.82%

+0.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.05%

15.38%

+0.67%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.04%

15.20%

+0.84%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.99%

14.96%

+2.03%

RMBTX vs. KGGAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RMBTX has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than KGGAX's 1.26% expense ratio.


Dividends

RMBTX vs. KGGAX - Dividend Comparison

RMBTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.45%, less than KGGAX's 15.56% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
KGGAX
Kopernik Global All-Cap Fund Class A
15.56%16.11%1.04%8.29%13.22%9.00%4.59%2.72%0.00%4.12%3.09%0.40%
RMBTX
RMB International Fund
1.45%1.66%2.44%2.03%2.08%1.03%0.64%1.17%0.22%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


RMBTX and KGGAX have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RMBTX has higher volatility (4.88%) compared to KGGAX (4.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RMBTX dropped -38.70% vs KGGAX's -45.27%.

RMBTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.98 vs 1.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RMBTX and KGGAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer