PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RMBTX vs. FIQIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RMBTX vs. FIQIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in RMB International Fund (RMBTX) and Fidelity Advisor International Small Cap Fund Class Z (FIQIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RMBTX achieves a 14.12% return, which is significantly higher than FIQIX's 10.24% return.


RMBTX

1D
0.72%
1M
7.34%
YTD
14.12%
6M
16.89%
1Y
28.82%
3Y*
16.00%
5Y*
8.00%
10Y*

FIQIX

1D
-0.37%
1M
3.45%
YTD
10.24%
6M
12.19%
1Y
19.04%
3Y*
14.55%
5Y*
6.41%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RMBTX vs. FIQIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
RMBTX
RMB International Fund
14.12%32.72%0.01%12.94%-16.92%9.52%7.01%19.21%-12.94%
FIQIX
Fidelity Advisor International Small Cap Fund Class Z
10.24%24.80%0.14%19.76%-16.53%13.56%10.12%21.61%-7.47%

Correlation

The correlation between RMBTX and FIQIX is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.83

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.85

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 18, 2018

0.88

The correlation between RMBTX and FIQIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RMBTX vs. FIQIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RMBTX
RMBTX Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
RMBTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RMBTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
RMBTX Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
RMBTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
RMBTX Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank

FIQIX
FIQIX Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
FIQIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FIQIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
FIQIX Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
FIQIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
FIQIX Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RMBTX vs. FIQIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RMB International Fund (RMBTX) and Fidelity Advisor International Small Cap Fund Class Z (FIQIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RMBTXFIQIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.26

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.25

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.29

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.35

1.75

+0.61

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.87

6.26

+2.61

RMBTX vs. FIQIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RMBTX Sharpe Ratio is 1.80, which is comparable to the FIQIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RMBTX and FIQIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RMBTXFIQIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.80

1.53

+0.26

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

0.47

+0.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.30

0.60

-0.31

Drawdowns

RMBTX vs. FIQIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RMBTX drawdown since its inception was -38.70%, which is greater than FIQIX's maximum drawdown of -36.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RMBTX and FIQIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RMBTXFIQIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.70%

-36.61%

-2.09%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.95%

-10.72%

-1.23%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.45%

-12.65%

-1.80%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.68%

-30.95%

+2.27%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-1.07%

+1.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.81%

-6.77%

-3.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.16%

2.98%

+0.18%

Volatility

RMBTX vs. FIQIX - Volatility Comparison

RMB International Fund (RMBTX) has a higher volatility of 5.23% compared to Fidelity Advisor International Small Cap Fund Class Z (FIQIX) at 3.81%. This indicates that RMBTX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FIQIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RMBTXFIQIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.23%

3.81%

+1.42%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.74%

10.15%

+2.59%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.66%

12.23%

+3.43%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.96%

13.56%

+2.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.98%

15.15%

+1.83%

RMBTX vs. FIQIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RMBTX has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than FIQIX's 0.89% expense ratio.


Dividends

RMBTX vs. FIQIX - Dividend Comparison

RMBTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.45%, less than FIQIX's 3.34% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
FIQIX
Fidelity Advisor International Small Cap Fund Class Z
3.34%3.68%2.73%1.99%0.83%7.39%0.93%2.47%6.33%
RMBTX
RMB International Fund
1.45%1.66%2.44%2.03%2.08%1.03%0.64%1.17%0.22%

Frequently Asked Questions


RMBTX and FIQIX have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RMBTX has higher volatility (5.23%) compared to FIQIX (3.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RMBTX dropped -38.70% vs FIQIX's -36.61%.

RMBTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.80 vs 1.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RMBTX and FIQIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer