PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RMBTX vs. CSGIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RMBTX vs. CSGIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in RMB International Fund (RMBTX) and Calamos International Small Cap Growth Fund (CSGIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RMBTX achieves a 14.12% return, which is significantly lower than CSGIX's 35.70% return.


RMBTX

1D
0.72%
1M
7.34%
YTD
14.12%
6M
16.89%
1Y
28.82%
3Y*
16.00%
5Y*
8.00%
10Y*

CSGIX

1D
-0.97%
1M
7.21%
YTD
35.70%
6M
38.48%
1Y
36.65%
3Y*
24.69%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RMBTX vs. CSGIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
RMBTX
RMB International Fund
14.12%32.72%0.01%12.94%-11.40%
CSGIX
Calamos International Small Cap Growth Fund
35.70%15.11%10.21%13.62%-20.14%

Correlation

The correlation between RMBTX and CSGIX is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.69

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.74

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 1, 2022

0.79

The correlation between RMBTX and CSGIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.69 (1 year) to 0.79 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RMBTX vs. CSGIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RMBTX
RMBTX Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
RMBTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RMBTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
RMBTX Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
RMBTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
RMBTX Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank

CSGIX
CSGIX Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
CSGIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CSGIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
CSGIX Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
CSGIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
CSGIX Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RMBTX vs. CSGIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RMB International Fund (RMBTX) and Calamos International Small Cap Growth Fund (CSGIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RMBTXCSGIXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.80

1.85

-0.05

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.47

2.54

-0.07

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.34

-0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.35

2.64

-0.28

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.87

7.04

+1.84

RMBTX vs. CSGIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RMBTX Sharpe Ratio is 1.80, which is comparable to the CSGIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RMBTX and CSGIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RMBTXCSGIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.80

1.85

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.30

0.64

-0.35

Drawdowns

RMBTX vs. CSGIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RMBTX drawdown since its inception was -38.70%, which is greater than CSGIX's maximum drawdown of -26.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RMBTX and CSGIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RMBTXCSGIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.70%

-26.50%

-12.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.95%

-13.68%

+1.73%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.45%

-20.13%

+5.68%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.68%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-2.05%

+2.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.81%

-10.25%

+0.44%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.16%

5.12%

-1.96%

Volatility

RMBTX vs. CSGIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for RMB International Fund (RMBTX) is 5.23%, while Calamos International Small Cap Growth Fund (CSGIX) has a volatility of 7.90%. This indicates that RMBTX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CSGIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RMBTXCSGIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.23%

7.90%

-2.67%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.74%

16.77%

-4.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.66%

19.55%

-3.89%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.96%

17.66%

-1.70%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.98%

17.66%

-0.68%

RMBTX vs. CSGIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RMBTX has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than CSGIX's 2.67% expense ratio.


Dividends

RMBTX vs. CSGIX - Dividend Comparison

RMBTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.45%, more than CSGIX's 0.90% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
CSGIX
Calamos International Small Cap Growth Fund
0.90%1.22%0.00%0.00%0.71%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
RMBTX
RMB International Fund
1.45%1.66%2.44%2.03%2.08%1.03%0.64%1.17%0.22%

Frequently Asked Questions


RMBTX and CSGIX have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CSGIX has higher volatility (7.90%) compared to RMBTX (5.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RMBTX dropped -38.70% vs CSGIX's -26.50%.

CSGIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.85 vs 1.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RMBTX and CSGIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer