RMBPX vs. FIQLX

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about RMB Japan Fund (RMBPX) and Fidelity Advisor Japan Fund Class Z (FIQLX).

RMBPX is managed by RMB Funds. It was launched on Dec 26, 2017. FIQLX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Oct 2, 2018.

Performance

RMBPX vs. FIQLX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in RMB Japan Fund (RMBPX) and Fidelity Advisor Japan Fund Class Z (FIQLX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

RMBPX vs. FIQLX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
RMBPX RMB Japan Fund	0.00%	-0.24%	-14.03%	19.33%	-14.50%	-2.65%	13.06%	17.64%	-10.14%
FIQLX Fidelity Advisor Japan Fund Class Z	2.59%	31.84%	7.43%	16.09%	-22.16%	3.32%	25.58%	25.93%	-11.46%

Returns By Period

RMBPX

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FIQLX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: -12.73%
• YTD: 2.59%
• 6M: 5.97%
• 1Y: 32.83%
• 3Y*: 16.22%
• 5Y*: 6.19%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RMBPX vs. FIQLX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RMBPX has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is higher than FIQLX's 0.96% expense ratio.

RMBPX

RMB Japan Fund

FIQLX

Fidelity Advisor Japan Fund Class Z

Return for Risk

RMBPX vs. FIQLX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FIQLX

FIQLX Risk / Return Rank: 77
FIQLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 76
FIQLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 75
FIQLX Omega Ratio Rank: 69
FIQLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 84
FIQLX Martin Ratio Rank: 82

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RMBPX vs. FIQLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RMB Japan Fund (RMBPX) and Fidelity Advisor Japan Fund Class Z (FIQLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	RMBPX	FIQLX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	1.38	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.32	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	—	0.46	—

Correlation

The correlation between RMBPX and FIQLX is 0.80, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

RMBPX vs. FIQLX - Dividend Comparison

RMBPX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FIQLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.79%.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
RMBPX RMB Japan Fund	0.00%	0.00%	3.28%	4.43%	1.04%	8.11%	0.29%	1.15%	0.36%
FIQLX Fidelity Advisor Japan Fund Class Z	9.79%	10.04%	5.04%	3.88%	0.00%	11.89%	1.97%	1.35%	0.48%

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	RMBPX	FIQLX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	—	-36.13%	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-12.73%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-36.13%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	—	-12.73%	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	—	-10.48%	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	3.51%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	RMBPX	FIQLX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	9.75%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	16.15%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	22.81%	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	—	19.64%	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	—	19.73%	—