RM8U.DE vs. FCO2.DE

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

RM8U.DE (HANetf The Royal Mint Responsibly Sourced Physical Gold ETC) and FCO2.DE (HANetf SparkChange Physical Carbon EUA ETC) are both exchange-traded funds - RM8U.DE is a Precious Metals fund tracking the Gold, while FCO2.DE is a Commodities fund tracking the EU Carbon Emission Allowances (EUA). Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, RM8U.DE returned 27.86%/yr vs -3.01%/yr for FCO2.DE. At a 0.05 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. RM8U.DE charges 0.22%/yr vs 0.89%/yr for FCO2.DE.

Performance

RM8U.DE vs. FCO2.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in HANetf The Royal Mint Responsibly Sourced Physical Gold ETC (RM8U.DE) and HANetf SparkChange Physical Carbon EUA ETC (FCO2.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RM8U.DE achieves a 2.70% return, which is significantly higher than FCO2.DE's -10.46% return.

RM8U.DE

• 1D: 0.59%
• 1M: -1.56%
• YTD: 2.70%
• 6M: 6.33%
• 1Y: 30.06%
• 3Y*: 27.86%
• 5Y*: 19.57%
• 10Y*: —

FCO2.DE

• 1D: -2.02%
• 1M: 1.82%
• YTD: -10.46%
• 6M: -8.30%
• 1Y: 5.04%
• 3Y*: -3.01%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RM8U.DE vs. FCO2.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
RM8U.DE HANetf The Royal Mint Responsibly Sourced Physical Gold ETC	2.70%	48.89%	34.03%	9.20%	-1.57%
FCO2.DE HANetf SparkChange Physical Carbon EUA ETC	-10.46%	20.70%	-11.00%	-5.14%	-0.32%

Correlation

The correlation between RM8U.DE and FCO2.DE is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.17
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.11
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 8, 2022	0.05

The correlation between RM8U.DE and FCO2.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.05 (all time) to 0.17 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

RM8U.DE vs. FCO2.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RM8U.DE

RM8U.DE Risk / Return Rank: 36
RM8U.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 37
RM8U.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
RM8U.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 40
RM8U.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 37
RM8U.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 31

FCO2.DE

FCO2.DE Risk / Return Rank: 12
FCO2.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 12
FCO2.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 12
FCO2.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 12
FCO2.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
FCO2.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 11

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RM8U.DE vs. FCO2.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HANetf The Royal Mint Responsibly Sourced Physical Gold ETC (RM8U.DE) and HANetf SparkChange Physical Carbon EUA ETC (FCO2.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	RM8U.DE	FCO2.DE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.30	0.19	+1.11
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.75	0.44	+1.31
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.26	1.06	+0.20
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.81	0.16	+1.65
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.58	0.41	+4.17
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

RM8U.DE vs. FCO2.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RM8U.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.30, which is higher than the FCO2.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RM8U.DE and FCO2.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	RM8U.DE	FCO2.DE	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.30	0.19	+1.11
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.21	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.01	-0.07	+1.08

Drawdowns

RM8U.DE vs. FCO2.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RM8U.DE drawdown since its inception was -18.51%, smaller than the maximum FCO2.DE drawdown of -48.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RM8U.DE and FCO2.DE.

Drawdown Indicators

	RM8U.DE	FCO2.DE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-18.51%	-48.49%	+29.98%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.54%	-31.46%	+14.92%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.54%	-45.60%	+29.06%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-16.54%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-15.01%	-24.40%	+9.39%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.13%	-23.38%	+17.25%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.55%	12.41%	-5.86%

Volatility

RM8U.DE vs. FCO2.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for HANetf The Royal Mint Responsibly Sourced Physical Gold ETC (RM8U.DE) is 5.04%, while HANetf SparkChange Physical Carbon EUA ETC (FCO2.DE) has a volatility of 5.99%. This indicates that RM8U.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FCO2.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RM8U.DE	FCO2.DE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.04%	5.99%	-0.95%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	20.04%	22.94%	-2.90%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	23.03%	26.69%	-3.66%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.99%	34.04%	-18.05%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.17%	34.04%	-17.87%

RM8U.DE vs. FCO2.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

RM8U.DE has a 0.22% expense ratio, which is lower than FCO2.DE's 0.89% expense ratio.

Dividends

RM8U.DE vs. FCO2.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither RM8U.DE nor FCO2.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RM8U.DE and FCO2.DE in my portfolio?

RM8U.DE and FCO2.DE have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, RM8U.DE or FCO2.DE?

On fees, RM8U.DE is cheaper at 0.22% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, RM8U.DE or FCO2.DE?

RM8U.DE is cheaper with a 0.22% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for FCO2.DE.

What is the main difference between RM8U.DE and FCO2.DE?

RM8U.DE is categorized as Precious Metals, while FCO2.DE is Commodities. RM8U.DE tracks Gold, while FCO2.DE tracks EU Carbon Emission Allowances (EUA). Their fees differ too: 0.22% for RM8U.DE and 0.89% for FCO2.DE.