PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RM vs. DBRG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

RM vs. DBRG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Regional Management Corp. (RM) and DigitalBridge Group, Inc. (DBRG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RM achieves a -6.56% return, which is significantly lower than DBRG's 2.22% return. Over the past 10 years, RM has outperformed DBRG with an annualized return of 9.68%, while DBRG has yielded a comparatively lower -6.85% annualized return.


RM

1D
-3.00%
1M
2.74%
YTD
-6.56%
6M
-2.20%
1Y
39.69%
3Y*
13.75%
5Y*
-2.37%
10Y*
9.68%

DBRG

1D
0.00%
1M
0.77%
YTD
2.22%
6M
65.16%
1Y
41.10%
3Y*
7.19%
5Y*
-10.78%
10Y*
-6.85%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RM vs. DBRG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RM
Regional Management Corp.
-6.56%18.11%41.51%-6.63%-49.62%96.32%0.26%24.86%-8.59%0.11%
DBRG
DigitalBridge Group, Inc.
2.22%36.48%-35.51%60.77%-67.11%73.18%6.54%10.47%-55.58%-10.36%

Correlation

The correlation between RM and DBRG is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.24

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.27

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.34

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.30

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2014

0.29

Fundamentals

Market Cap

RM:

$343.77M

DBRG:

$2.82B

EPS

RM:

$4.93

DBRG:

$0.75

PE Ratio

RM:

7.21

DBRG:

20.78

PEG Ratio

RM:

0.54

DBRG:

0.22

PS Ratio

RM:

0.53

DBRG:

6.28

PB Ratio

RM:

0.91

DBRG:

2.15

Total Revenue (TTM)

RM:

$659.90M

DBRG:

$441.46M

Gross Profit (TTM)

RM:

$430.02M

DBRG:

$324.77M

EBITDA (TTM)

RM:

$117.08M

DBRG:

$127.00M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RM vs. DBRG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RM
RM Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
RM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RM Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
RM Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
RM Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
RM Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

DBRG
DBRG Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
DBRG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DBRG Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
DBRG Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
DBRG Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
DBRG Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RM vs. DBRG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Regional Management Corp. (RM) and DigitalBridge Group, Inc. (DBRG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RMDBRGDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.00

0.72

+0.28

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.45

2.21

-0.77

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.33

-0.13

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.26

1.25

+0.01

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

2.43

4.45

-2.02

RM vs. DBRG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RM Sharpe Ratio is 1.00, which is higher than the DBRG Sharpe Ratio of 0.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RM and DBRG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RMDBRGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.00

0.72

+0.28

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.06

-0.21

+0.15

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.21

-0.13

+0.34

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.16

-0.17

+0.33

Drawdowns

RM vs. DBRG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RM drawdown since its inception was -71.80%, smaller than the maximum DBRG drawdown of -91.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RM and DBRG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RMDBRGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-71.80%

-91.72%

+19.92%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-31.05%

-33.69%

+2.64%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-38.09%

-67.03%

+28.94%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-64.63%

-79.83%

+15.20%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-71.80%

-88.18%

+16.38%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-33.46%

-75.52%

+42.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-33.67%

-60.67%

+27.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

16.09%

9.46%

+6.63%

Volatility

RM vs. DBRG - Volatility Comparison

Regional Management Corp. (RM) has a higher volatility of 9.86% compared to DigitalBridge Group, Inc. (DBRG) at 0.73%. This indicates that RM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DBRG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RMDBRGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.86%

0.73%

+9.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

30.05%

40.32%

-10.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

39.94%

57.59%

-17.65%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

41.68%

52.71%

-11.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

45.86%

53.42%

-7.56%

Dividends

RM vs. DBRG - Dividend Comparison

RM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.37%, more than DBRG's 0.26% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DBRG
DigitalBridge Group, Inc.
0.26%0.26%0.35%0.23%0.18%0.00%2.29%9.26%9.40%19.40%2.68%3.29%
RM
Regional Management Corp.
3.37%3.10%3.53%4.78%4.27%1.65%0.67%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

RM vs. DBRG - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Regional Management Corp. and DigitalBridge Group, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00100.00M200.00M300.00M400.00M20222023202420252026
167.29M
72.24M
(RM) Total Revenue
(DBRG) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

RM vs. DBRG - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Regional Management Corp. and DigitalBridge Group, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%20222023202420252026
100.0%
0
Portfolio components
RM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Regional Management Corp. reported a gross profit of 167.29M and revenue of 167.29M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 100.0%.

DBRG - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, DigitalBridge Group, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 72.24M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

RM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Regional Management Corp. reported an operating income of 37.76M and revenue of 167.29M, resulting in an operating margin of 22.6%.

DBRG - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, DigitalBridge Group, Inc. reported an operating income of 7.52M and revenue of 72.24M, resulting in an operating margin of 10.4%.

RM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Regional Management Corp. reported a net income of 11.40M and revenue of 167.29M, resulting in a net margin of 6.8%.

DBRG - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, DigitalBridge Group, Inc. reported a net income of 5.31M and revenue of 72.24M, resulting in a net margin of 7.3%.


Frequently Asked Questions


RM and DBRG have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RM has higher volatility (9.86%) compared to DBRG (0.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RM dropped -71.80% vs DBRG's -91.72%.

RM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.00 vs 0.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RM and DBRG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer