RLCAX vs. SHGTX
Compare and contrast key facts about Columbia Disciplined Value Fund (RLCAX) and Columbia Seligman Global Technology Fund (SHGTX).
RLCAX is managed by Columbia. It was launched on Aug 1, 2008. SHGTX is managed by Columbia. It was launched on May 22, 1994.
Performance
RLCAX vs. SHGTX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
RLCAX vs. SHGTX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RLCAX Columbia Disciplined Value Fund | 0.23% | 14.67% | 16.24% | 15.40% | -7.33% | 29.54% | 2.11% | 19.23% | -9.36% | 15.42% |
SHGTX Columbia Seligman Global Technology Fund | -0.71% | 35.09% | 26.04% | 45.28% | -31.70% | 38.60% | 45.56% | 54.92% | -8.70% | 34.52% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RLCAX achieves a 0.23% return, which is significantly higher than SHGTX's -0.71% return. Over the past 10 years, RLCAX has underperformed SHGTX with an annualized return of 10.23%, while SHGTX has yielded a comparatively higher 22.02% annualized return.
RLCAX
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- -6.09%
- YTD
- 0.23%
- 6M
- 4.05%
- 1Y
- 14.93%
- 3Y*
- 14.42%
- 5Y*
- 10.46%
- 10Y*
- 10.23%
SHGTX
- 1D
- -2.88%
- 1M
- -9.71%
- YTD
- -0.71%
- 6M
- 4.16%
- 1Y
- 53.78%
- 3Y*
- 28.05%
- 5Y*
- 15.91%
- 10Y*
- 22.02%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
RLCAX vs. SHGTX - Expense Ratio Comparison
RLCAX has a 1.04% expense ratio, which is lower than SHGTX's 1.29% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
RLCAX vs. SHGTX — Risk / Return Rank
RLCAX
SHGTX
RLCAX vs. SHGTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Disciplined Value Fund (RLCAX) and Columbia Seligman Global Technology Fund (SHGTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RLCAX | SHGTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.02 | 1.75 | -0.73 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.47 | 2.31 | -0.84 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.32 | -0.10 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.16 | 3.25 | -2.08 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.48 | 12.21 | -6.72 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RLCAX | SHGTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.02 | 1.75 | -0.73 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.45 | 0.59 | -0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.47 | 0.83 | -0.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.53 | 0.59 | -0.07 |
Correlation
The correlation between RLCAX and SHGTX is 0.74, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
RLCAX vs. SHGTX - Dividend Comparison
RLCAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.74%, more than SHGTX's 8.51% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RLCAX Columbia Disciplined Value Fund | 11.74% | 11.76% | 11.66% | 7.59% | 13.00% | 31.01% | 1.54% | 10.78% | 11.88% | 5.35% | 1.53% | 6.78% |
SHGTX Columbia Seligman Global Technology Fund | 8.51% | 8.45% | 14.04% | 6.22% | 3.94% | 11.77% | 9.92% | 10.26% | 12.75% | 7.25% | 8.13% | 8.09% |
Drawdowns
RLCAX vs. SHGTX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RLCAX drawdown since its inception was -37.83%, smaller than the maximum SHGTX drawdown of -77.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RLCAX and SHGTX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| RLCAX | SHGTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.83% | -77.47% | +39.64% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.25% | -14.93% | +2.68% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.73% | -43.17% | +8.44% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.83% | -43.17% | +5.34% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.30% | -12.38% | +6.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.23% | -25.07% | +17.84% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.60% | 3.97% | -1.37% |
Volatility
RLCAX vs. SHGTX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Columbia Disciplined Value Fund (RLCAX) is 3.17%, while Columbia Seligman Global Technology Fund (SHGTX) has a volatility of 9.43%. This indicates that RLCAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SHGTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| RLCAX | SHGTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.17% | 9.43% | -6.26% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.88% | 21.01% | -13.13% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.75% | 30.65% | -14.90% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.44% | 27.20% | -3.76% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.69% | 26.58% | -4.89% |