RKTL vs. MULL
RKTL (Defiance Daily Target 2X Long RKT ETF) and MULL (GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. RKTL is passively managed, while MULL is actively managed. At a 0.07 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. RKTL charges 1.31%/yr vs 1.50%/yr for MULL.
Performance
RKTL vs. MULL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
RKTL
- 1D
- 4.20%
- 1M
- -17.90%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MULL
- 1D
- -15.62%
- 1M
- 119.20%
- YTD
- 774.91%
- 6M
- 1,229.17%
- 1Y
- 5,016.23%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RKTL vs. MULL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
RKTL Defiance Daily Target 2X Long RKT ETF | -74.30% |
MULL GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF | 539.85% |
Correlation
The correlation between RKTL and MULL is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 14, 2026 | 0.07 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RKTL vs. MULL — Risk / Return Rank
RKTL
MULL
RKTL vs. MULL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Daily Target 2X Long RKT ETF (RKTL) and GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF (MULL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RKTL | MULL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 38.21 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.77 | 6.53 | -7.30 |
Drawdowns
RKTL vs. MULL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RKTL drawdown since its inception was -77.06%, which is greater than MULL's maximum drawdown of -72.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RKTL and MULL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RKTL | MULL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -77.06% | -72.29% | -4.77% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -53.09% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -75.54% | -15.62% | -59.92% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -55.71% | -20.61% | -35.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 15.82% | — |
Volatility
RKTL vs. MULL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RKTL | MULL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 57.59% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 107.25% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 126.92% | 133.41% | -6.49% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 126.92% | 136.72% | -9.80% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 126.92% | 136.72% | -9.80% |
RKTL vs. MULL - Expense Ratio Comparison
RKTL has a 1.31% expense ratio, which is lower than MULL's 1.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
RKTL vs. MULL - Dividend Comparison
RKTL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MULL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.04%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
MULL GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF | 0.04% | 0.39% |
RKTL Defiance Daily Target 2X Long RKT ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RKTL and MULL have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, RKTL is cheaper at 1.31% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
RKTL is cheaper with a 1.31% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for MULL.
MULL has the higher dividend yield at 0.04%, compared with 0.00% for RKTL.
They also come from different issuers: Defiance and GraniteShares. Their fees differ too: 1.31% for RKTL and 1.50% for MULL.
Find the right allocation for RKTL and MULL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer