RKTL vs. IFED
RKTL (Defiance Daily Target 2X Long RKT ETF) and IFED (ETRACS IFED Invest with the Fed TR Index ETN) are both Leveraged Equities funds - RKTL tracks the Rocket Companies, Inc. (RKT) while IFED tracks the IFED Large-Cap US Equity Index - Benchmark TR Gross. Both are passively managed. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. RKTL charges 1.31%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for IFED.
Performance
RKTL vs. IFED - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
RKTL
- 1D
- 3.49%
- 1M
- 7.10%
- 6M
- -71.65%
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IFED
- 1D
- 0.81%
- 1M
- -0.83%
- 6M
- -2.70%
- YTD
- -2.92%
- 1Y
- 0.79%
- 3Y*
- 14.75%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RKTL vs. IFED - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
RKTL Defiance Daily Target 2X Long RKT ETF | -70.91% |
IFED ETRACS IFED Invest with the Fed TR Index ETN | -3.46% |
Correlation
The correlation between RKTL and IFED is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 13, 2026 | 0.47 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RKTL vs. IFED — Risk / Return Rank
RKTL
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
IFED
RKTL vs. IFED - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Daily Target 2X Long RKT ETF (RKTL) and ETRACS IFED Invest with the Fed TR Index ETN (IFED). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RKTL | IFED | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.02 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 0.05 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 0.13 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RKTL vs. IFED - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RKTL drawdown since its inception was -79.04%, which is greater than IFED's maximum drawdown of -22.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RKTL and IFED.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RKTL | IFED | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -79.04% | -22.36% | -56.68% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -14.65% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -22.36% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -71.65% | -4.91% | -66.74% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -59.15% | -5.83% | -53.32% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 6.04% | — |
Volatility
RKTL vs. IFED - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RKTL | IFED | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 6.87% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 15.11% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 128.05% | 17.72% | +110.33% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 128.05% | 20.00% | +108.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 128.05% | 20.00% | +108.05% |
RKTL vs. IFED - Expense Ratio Comparison
RKTL has a 1.31% expense ratio, which is higher than IFED's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
RKTL vs. IFED - Dividend Comparison
Neither RKTL nor IFED has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
RKTL and IFED have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IFED is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IFED is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 1.31% for RKTL.
RKTL and IFED have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
RKTL tracks Rocket Companies, Inc. (RKT), while IFED tracks IFED Large-Cap US Equity Index - Benchmark TR Gross. They also come from different issuers: Defiance and UBS. Their fees differ too: 1.31% for RKTL and 0.45% for IFED.
Find the right allocation for RKTL and IFED
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer