PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RKT.L vs. MSFT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

RKT.L vs. MSFT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Reckitt Benckiser Group plc (RKT.L) and Microsoft Corporation (MSFT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

RKT.L is traded in GBp, while MSFT is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the MSFT values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RKT.L achieves a -24.11% return, which is significantly lower than MSFT's -18.43% return. Over the past 10 years, RKT.L has underperformed MSFT with an annualized return of -0.95%, while MSFT has yielded a comparatively higher 25.03% annualized return.


RKT.L

1D
1.27%
1M
2.66%
YTD
-24.11%
6M
-24.09%
1Y
-10.45%
3Y*
-5.69%
5Y*
-3.94%
10Y*
-0.95%

MSFT

1D
0.19%
1M
-2.51%
YTD
-18.43%
6M
-18.19%
1Y
-16.45%
3Y*
4.02%
5Y*
10.70%
10Y*
25.03%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RKT.L vs. MSFT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RKT.L
Reckitt Benckiser Group plc
-24.11%29.18%-6.74%-2.96%-6.86%-0.34%9.42%4.81%-10.86%2.60%
MSFT
Microsoft Corporation
-18.43%7.35%14.90%50.28%-19.47%53.92%38.35%51.56%27.96%28.56%

Correlation

The correlation between RKT.L and MSFT is -0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.06

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.09

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.03

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.12

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 11, 2007

0.17

The correlation between RKT.L and MSFT shifts across timeframes, from -0.09 (3 years) to 0.17 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

RKT.L:

£30.25B

MSFT:

$2.91T

EPS

RKT.L:

£6.17

MSFT:

$16.79

PE Ratio

RKT.L:

7.51

MSFT:

23.27

PEG Ratio

RKT.L:

0.15

MSFT:

1.63

PS Ratio

RKT.L:

1.25

MSFT:

9.16

PB Ratio

RKT.L:

3.91

MSFT:

7.02

Total Revenue (TTM)

RKT.L:

£24.88B

MSFT:

$318.27B

Gross Profit (TTM)

RKT.L:

£15.10B

MSFT:

$217.41B

EBITDA (TTM)

RKT.L:

£6.67B

MSFT:

$200.96B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RKT.L vs. MSFT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RKT.L
RKT.L Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
RKT.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RKT.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
RKT.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
RKT.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
RKT.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank

MSFT
MSFT Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
MSFT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MSFT Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
MSFT Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
MSFT Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
MSFT Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RKT.L vs. MSFT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Reckitt Benckiser Group plc (RKT.L) and Microsoft Corporation (MSFT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RKT.LMSFTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.17

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.16

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.93

0.90

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.35

-0.48

+0.14

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.83

-0.94

+0.11

RKT.L vs. MSFT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RKT.L Sharpe Ratio is -0.47, which is comparable to the MSFT Sharpe Ratio of -0.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RKT.L and MSFT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RKT.L vs. MSFT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RKT.L drawdown since its inception was -42.08%, which is greater than MSFT's maximum drawdown of -40.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RKT.L and MSFT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RKT.LMSFTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.08%

-40.05%

-2.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-30.10%

-34.18%

+4.08%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-30.10%

-34.18%

+4.08%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.84%

-34.18%

-1.66%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.08%

-34.18%

-7.90%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-31.69%

-28.53%

-3.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.73%

-8.84%

-2.89%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.51%

17.53%

-5.02%

Volatility

RKT.L vs. MSFT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Reckitt Benckiser Group plc (RKT.L) is 6.94%, while Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) has a volatility of 10.61%. This indicates that RKT.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MSFT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RKT.LMSFTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.94%

10.61%

-3.67%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.21%

21.91%

-4.70%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.01%

25.64%

-3.63%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.54%

25.92%

-3.38%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.37%

27.30%

-4.93%

Dividends

RKT.L vs. MSFT - Dividend Comparison

RKT.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.93%, more than MSFT's 0.91% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MSFT
Microsoft Corporation
0.91%0.70%0.73%0.74%1.06%0.68%0.94%1.20%1.69%1.86%2.37%2.33%
RKT.L
Reckitt Benckiser Group plc
9.93%3.30%3.90%3.31%2.91%2.64%2.56%2.71%2.69%2.24%2.05%1.98%

Financials

RKT.L vs. MSFT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Reckitt Benckiser Group plc and Microsoft Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0020.00B40.00B60.00B80.00B202120222023202420252026
7.22B
82.89B
(RKT.L) Total Revenue
(MSFT) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. RKT.L values in GBP, MSFT values in USD

RKT.L vs. MSFT - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Reckitt Benckiser Group plc and Microsoft Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

60.0%65.0%70.0%202120222023202420252026
60.6%
67.6%
Portfolio components
RKT.L - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Reckitt Benckiser Group plc reported a gross profit of 4.37B and revenue of 7.22B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 60.6%.

MSFT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Microsoft Corporation reported a gross profit of 56.06B and revenue of 82.89B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 67.6%.

RKT.L - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Reckitt Benckiser Group plc reported an operating income of 2.72B and revenue of 7.22B, resulting in an operating margin of 37.6%.

MSFT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Microsoft Corporation reported an operating income of 38.40B and revenue of 82.89B, resulting in an operating margin of 46.3%.

RKT.L - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Reckitt Benckiser Group plc reported a net income of 2.22B and revenue of 7.22B, resulting in a net margin of 30.8%.

MSFT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Microsoft Corporation reported a net income of 31.78B and revenue of 82.89B, resulting in a net margin of 38.3%.


Frequently Asked Questions


RKT.L and MSFT have a correlation of -0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RKT.L and MSFT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer