PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RKT.L vs. GOOGL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

RKT.L vs. GOOGL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Reckitt Benckiser Group plc (RKT.L) and Alphabet Inc. Class A (GOOGL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

RKT.L is traded in GBp, while GOOGL is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the GOOGL values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RKT.L achieves a -25.78% return, which is significantly lower than GOOGL's 19.01% return. Over the past 10 years, RKT.L has underperformed GOOGL with an annualized return of -1.40%, while GOOGL has yielded a comparatively higher 26.91% annualized return.


RKT.L

1D
-0.29%
1M
-2.89%
YTD
-25.78%
6M
-24.52%
1Y
-11.49%
3Y*
-6.65%
5Y*
-4.27%
10Y*
-1.40%

GOOGL

1D
0.00%
1M
-6.03%
YTD
19.01%
6M
17.40%
1Y
115.91%
3Y*
42.04%
5Y*
26.70%
10Y*
26.91%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RKT.L vs. GOOGL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RKT.L
Reckitt Benckiser Group plc
-25.78%29.18%-6.74%-2.96%-6.86%-0.34%9.42%4.81%-10.86%2.60%
GOOGL
Alphabet Inc. Class A
17.36%54.17%38.38%50.41%-31.85%66.86%27.01%23.30%5.08%21.43%

Correlation

The correlation between RKT.L and GOOGL is 0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.03

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.05

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.00

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.10

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 6, 2007

0.17

The correlation between RKT.L and GOOGL shifts across timeframes, from -0.05 (3 years) to 0.17 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

RKT.L:

£29.59B

GOOGL:

$4.45T

EPS

RKT.L:

£6.17

GOOGL:

$13.11

PE Ratio

RKT.L:

7.35

GOOGL:

27.70

PEG Ratio

RKT.L:

0.15

GOOGL:

1.36

PS Ratio

RKT.L:

1.22

GOOGL:

10.50

PB Ratio

RKT.L:

3.82

GOOGL:

9.29

Total Revenue (TTM)

RKT.L:

£24.88B

GOOGL:

$422.57B

Gross Profit (TTM)

RKT.L:

£15.10B

GOOGL:

$255.12B

EBITDA (TTM)

RKT.L:

£6.67B

GOOGL:

$174.08B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RKT.L vs. GOOGL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RKT.L
RKT.L Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
RKT.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RKT.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
RKT.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
RKT.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
RKT.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank

GOOGL
GOOGL Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
GOOGL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GOOGL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
GOOGL Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
GOOGL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
GOOGL Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RKT.L vs. GOOGL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Reckitt Benckiser Group plc (RKT.L) and Alphabet Inc. Class A (GOOGL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RKT.LGOOGLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-4.65

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-6.04

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.92

1.67

-0.75

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.38

6.59

-6.97

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.95

22.84

-23.79

RKT.L vs. GOOGL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RKT.L Sharpe Ratio is -0.53, which is lower than the GOOGL Sharpe Ratio of 4.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RKT.L and GOOGL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RKT.LGOOGLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.53

4.13

-4.65

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.19

0.88

-1.07

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.06

0.93

-0.99

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.30

0.73

-0.43

Drawdowns

RKT.L vs. GOOGL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RKT.L drawdown since its inception was -42.08%, smaller than the maximum GOOGL drawdown of -52.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RKT.L and GOOGL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RKT.LGOOGLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.08%

-52.64%

+10.56%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-30.10%

-17.68%

-12.42%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-30.10%

-33.18%

+3.08%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.84%

-36.22%

+0.38%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.08%

-36.22%

-5.86%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-33.20%

-7.68%

-25.52%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.71%

-9.92%

-1.79%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.02%

5.09%

+6.93%

Volatility

RKT.L vs. GOOGL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Reckitt Benckiser Group plc (RKT.L) is 7.09%, while Alphabet Inc. Class A (GOOGL) has a volatility of 8.51%. This indicates that RKT.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GOOGL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RKT.LGOOGLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.09%

8.51%

-1.42%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.98%

19.58%

-2.60%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.85%

28.31%

-6.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.51%

30.42%

-7.91%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.37%

29.19%

-6.82%

Dividends

RKT.L vs. GOOGL - Dividend Comparison

RKT.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.15%, more than GOOGL's 0.29% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GOOGL
Alphabet Inc. Class A
0.29%0.27%0.32%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
RKT.L
Reckitt Benckiser Group plc
10.15%3.30%3.90%3.31%2.91%2.64%2.56%2.71%2.69%2.24%2.05%1.98%

Financials

RKT.L vs. GOOGL - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Reckitt Benckiser Group plc and Alphabet Inc. Class A. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0020.00B40.00B60.00B80.00B100.00B120.00B202120222023202420252026
7.22B
109.90B
(RKT.L) Total Revenue
(GOOGL) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. RKT.L values in GBp, GOOGL values in USD

RKT.L vs. GOOGL - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Reckitt Benckiser Group plc and Alphabet Inc. Class A over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

54.0%56.0%58.0%60.0%62.0%202120222023202420252026
60.6%
62.5%
Portfolio components
RKT.L - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Reckitt Benckiser Group plc reported a gross profit of 4.37B and revenue of 7.22B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 60.6%.

GOOGL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Alphabet Inc. Class A reported a gross profit of 68.63B and revenue of 109.90B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 62.5%.

RKT.L - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Reckitt Benckiser Group plc reported an operating income of 2.72B and revenue of 7.22B, resulting in an operating margin of 37.6%.

GOOGL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Alphabet Inc. Class A reported an operating income of 39.70B and revenue of 109.90B, resulting in an operating margin of 36.1%.

RKT.L - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Reckitt Benckiser Group plc reported a net income of 2.22B and revenue of 7.22B, resulting in a net margin of 30.8%.

GOOGL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Alphabet Inc. Class A reported a net income of 62.58B and revenue of 109.90B, resulting in a net margin of 56.9%.


Frequently Asked Questions


RKT.L and GOOGL have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RKT.L and GOOGL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer