RKNG vs. VCR
RKNG (Defiance Retail Kings ETF) and VCR (Vanguard Consumer Discretionary ETF) are both Consumer Discretionary Equities funds. RKNG is actively managed, while VCR is passively managed. Their 0.45 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. RKNG charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for VCR.
Performance
RKNG vs. VCR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
RKNG
- 1D
- 0.01%
- 1M
- -14.50%
- 6M
- -5.47%
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
VCR
- 1D
- 2.71%
- 1M
- -1.07%
- 6M
- -1.60%
- YTD
- -0.28%
- 1Y
- 9.62%
- 3Y*
- 11.43%
- 5Y*
- 5.37%
- 10Y*
- 13.29%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.99%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $81.26K | $66.67K | $204.43K | |
| $24.44M | $25.79M | $24.81M |
RKNG vs. VCR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
RKNG Defiance Retail Kings ETF | -14.26% |
VCR Vanguard Consumer Discretionary ETF | -2.52% |
Correlation
The correlation between RKNG and VCR is 0.45, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 22, 2026 | 0.45 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RKNG vs. VCR — Risk / Return Rank
RKNG
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
VCR
RKNG vs. VCR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Retail Kings ETF (RKNG) and Vanguard Consumer Discretionary ETF (VCR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RKNG | VCR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.07 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 0.43 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 1.24 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RKNG vs. VCR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RKNG drawdown since its inception was -37.38%, smaller than the maximum VCR drawdown of -61.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RKNG and VCR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RKNG | VCR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.38% | -61.54% | +24.16% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -15.59% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -27.36% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -39.20% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -39.20% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -29.11% | -4.82% | -24.29% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.86% | -9.37% | -4.49% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 5.41% | — |
Volatility
RKNG vs. VCR - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RKNG | VCR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 6.75% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 14.76% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 64.89% | 19.57% | +45.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 64.89% | 24.21% | +40.68% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 64.89% | 22.50% | +42.39% |
RKNG vs. VCR - Expense Ratio Comparison
RKNG has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than VCR's 0.10% expense ratio.
Dividends
RKNG vs. VCR - Dividend Comparison
RKNG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VCR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.73%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RKNG Defiance Retail Kings ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VCR Vanguard Consumer Discretionary ETF | 0.73% | 0.74% | 0.74% | 0.84% | 0.98% | 0.79% | 1.71% | 1.17% | 1.37% | 1.21% | 1.60% | 1.32% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RKNG and VCR have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, VCR is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VCR is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for RKNG.
VCR has the higher dividend yield at 0.73%, compared with 0.00% for RKNG.
They also come from different issuers: Defiance and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for RKNG and 0.10% for VCR.
Find the right allocation for RKNG and VCR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer