RKNG vs. VCR
RKNG (Defiance Retail Kings ETF) and VCR (Vanguard Consumer Discretionary ETF) are both Consumer Discretionary Equities funds. RKNG is actively managed, while VCR is passively managed. A 0.53 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. RKNG charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for VCR.
Performance
RKNG vs. VCR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
RKNG
- 1D
- -2.33%
- 1M
- -8.71%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VCR
- 1D
- 0.39%
- 1M
- 0.94%
- 6M
- -3.74%
- YTD
- 0.85%
- 1Y
- 7.97%
- 3Y*
- 12.27%
- 5Y*
- 5.27%
- 10Y*
- 13.31%
RKNG vs. VCR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
RKNG Defiance Retail Kings ETF | -0.03% |
VCR Vanguard Consumer Discretionary ETF | -1.41% |
Correlation
The correlation between RKNG and VCR is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 22, 2026 | 0.53 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RKNG vs. VCR — Risk / Return Rank
RKNG
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
VCR
RKNG vs. VCR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Retail Kings ETF (RKNG) and Vanguard Consumer Discretionary ETF (VCR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RKNG | VCR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.08 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 0.51 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 1.51 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RKNG vs. VCR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RKNG drawdown since its inception was -34.21%, smaller than the maximum VCR drawdown of -61.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RKNG and VCR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RKNG | VCR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.21% | -61.54% | +27.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -15.59% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -27.36% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -39.20% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -39.20% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -17.35% | -3.74% | -13.61% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.29% | -9.38% | -2.91% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 5.20% | — |
Volatility
RKNG vs. VCR - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RKNG | VCR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 6.49% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 14.18% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 60.90% | 18.93% | +41.97% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 60.90% | 24.14% | +36.76% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 60.90% | 22.42% | +38.48% |
RKNG vs. VCR - Expense Ratio Comparison
RKNG has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than VCR's 0.10% expense ratio.
Dividends
RKNG vs. VCR - Dividend Comparison
RKNG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VCR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.72%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RKNG Defiance Retail Kings ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VCR Vanguard Consumer Discretionary ETF | 0.72% | 0.74% | 0.74% | 0.84% | 0.98% | 0.79% | 1.71% | 1.17% | 1.37% | 1.21% | 1.60% | 1.32% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RKNG and VCR have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, VCR is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VCR is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for RKNG.
VCR has the higher dividend yield at 0.72%, compared with 0.00% for RKNG.
They also come from different issuers: Defiance and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for RKNG and 0.10% for VCR.
Find the right allocation for RKNG and VCR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer