RKNG vs. QTUM
RKNG (Defiance Retail Kings ETF) and QTUM (Defiance Quantum ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RKNG is a Consumer Discretionary Equities fund actively managed by Defiance, while QTUM is a Technology Equities fund tracking the BlueStar Machine Learning and Quantum Computing Index. RKNG is actively managed, while QTUM is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. RKNG charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for QTUM.
Performance
RKNG vs. QTUM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
RKNG
- 1D
- -2.33%
- 1M
- -8.71%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QTUM
- 1D
- -0.71%
- 1M
- -4.08%
- 6M
- 33.03%
- YTD
- 41.37%
- 1Y
- 69.29%
- 3Y*
- 46.36%
- 5Y*
- 26.92%
- 10Y*
- —
RKNG vs. QTUM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
RKNG Defiance Retail Kings ETF | -0.03% |
QTUM Defiance Quantum ETF | 31.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between RKNG and QTUM is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 22, 2026 | 0.89 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RKNG vs. QTUM — Risk / Return Rank
RKNG
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
QTUM
RKNG vs. QTUM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Retail Kings ETF (RKNG) and Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RKNG | QTUM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.36 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 4.41 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 14.97 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RKNG vs. QTUM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RKNG drawdown since its inception was -34.21%, smaller than the maximum QTUM drawdown of -38.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RKNG and QTUM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RKNG | QTUM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.21% | -38.45% | +4.24% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -15.26% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -25.39% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -38.45% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -17.35% | -8.32% | -9.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.29% | -8.21% | -4.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 4.49% | — |
Volatility
RKNG vs. QTUM - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RKNG | QTUM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 12.79% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 24.81% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 60.90% | 30.13% | +30.77% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 60.90% | 27.38% | +33.52% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 60.90% | 27.55% | +33.35% |
RKNG vs. QTUM - Expense Ratio Comparison
RKNG has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than QTUM's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
RKNG vs. QTUM - Dividend Comparison
RKNG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QTUM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.76%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QTUM Defiance Quantum ETF | 0.76% | 1.01% | 0.61% | 0.81% | 1.46% | 0.48% | 0.42% | 0.61% | 0.21% |
RKNG Defiance Retail Kings ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RKNG and QTUM have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, QTUM is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
QTUM is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for RKNG.
QTUM has the higher dividend yield at 0.76%, compared with 0.00% for RKNG.
RKNG is categorized as Consumer Discretionary Equities, while QTUM is Technology Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for RKNG and 0.40% for QTUM.
Find the right allocation for RKNG and QTUM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer