RKLZ vs. BMNZ
RKLZ (Defiance Daily Target 2X Short RKLB ETF) and BMNZ (Defiance Daily Target 2X Short BMNR ETF) are both Inverse Equities funds from Defiance. RKLZ is actively managed, while BMNZ is passively managed. A 0.56 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. RKLZ charges 1.29%/yr vs 1.31%/yr for BMNZ.
Performance
RKLZ vs. BMNZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RKLZ achieves a -89.18% return, which is significantly lower than BMNZ's 29.97% return.
RKLZ
- 1D
- 10.97%
- 1M
- 137.97%
- YTD
- -89.18%
- 6M
- -87.03%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BMNZ
- 1D
- 9.79%
- 1M
- 76.32%
- YTD
- 29.97%
- 6M
- 50.80%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RKLZ vs. BMNZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
RKLZ Defiance Daily Target 2X Short RKLB ETF | -89.18% | -75.89% |
BMNZ Defiance Daily Target 2X Short BMNR ETF | 29.97% | -25.65% |
Correlation
The correlation between RKLZ and BMNZ is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 2025 | 0.56 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RKLZ vs. BMNZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Daily Target 2X Short RKLB ETF (RKLZ) and Defiance Daily Target 2X Short BMNR ETF (BMNZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RKLZ vs. BMNZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RKLZ drawdown since its inception was -99.10%, which is greater than BMNZ's maximum drawdown of -70.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RKLZ and BMNZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RKLZ | BMNZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.10% | -70.80% | -28.30% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -97.63% | -27.23% | -70.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -81.58% | -50.65% | -30.93% |
Volatility
RKLZ vs. BMNZ - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RKLZ | BMNZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 207.29% | 187.04% | +20.25% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 207.29% | 187.04% | +20.25% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 207.29% | 187.04% | +20.25% |
RKLZ vs. BMNZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
RKLZ has a 1.29% expense ratio, which is lower than BMNZ's 1.31% expense ratio.
Dividends
RKLZ vs. BMNZ - Dividend Comparison
Neither RKLZ nor BMNZ has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
RKLZ and BMNZ have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, RKLZ is cheaper at 1.29% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
RKLZ is cheaper with a 1.29% expense ratio, compared with 1.31% for BMNZ.
RKLZ and BMNZ have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
Their fees differ too: 1.29% for RKLZ and 1.31% for BMNZ.
Find the right allocation for RKLZ and BMNZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer