PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RKLZ vs. BMNZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RKLZ vs. BMNZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Defiance Daily Target 2X Short RKLB ETF (RKLZ) and Defiance Daily Target 2X Short BMNR ETF (BMNZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RKLZ achieves a -89.18% return, which is significantly lower than BMNZ's 29.97% return.


RKLZ

1D
10.97%
1M
137.97%
YTD
-89.18%
6M
-87.03%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BMNZ

1D
9.79%
1M
76.32%
YTD
29.97%
6M
50.80%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RKLZ vs. BMNZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between RKLZ and BMNZ is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 2025

0.56

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RKLZ vs. BMNZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Daily Target 2X Short RKLB ETF (RKLZ) and Defiance Daily Target 2X Short BMNR ETF (BMNZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

RKLZ vs. BMNZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RKLZ vs. BMNZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RKLZ drawdown since its inception was -99.10%, which is greater than BMNZ's maximum drawdown of -70.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RKLZ and BMNZ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RKLZBMNZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.10%

-70.80%

-28.30%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-97.63%

-27.23%

-70.40%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-81.58%

-50.65%

-30.93%

Volatility

RKLZ vs. BMNZ - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RKLZBMNZDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

207.29%

187.04%

+20.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

207.29%

187.04%

+20.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

207.29%

187.04%

+20.25%

RKLZ vs. BMNZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

RKLZ has a 1.29% expense ratio, which is lower than BMNZ's 1.31% expense ratio.


Dividends

RKLZ vs. BMNZ - Dividend Comparison

Neither RKLZ nor BMNZ has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


RKLZ and BMNZ have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, RKLZ is cheaper at 1.29% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

RKLZ is cheaper with a 1.29% expense ratio, compared with 1.31% for BMNZ.

RKLZ and BMNZ have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

Their fees differ too: 1.29% for RKLZ and 1.31% for BMNZ.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RKLZ and BMNZ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer