RKLB vs. MTSI
RKLB (Rocket Lab USA, Inc.) and MTSI (MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc.) are both stocks. RKLB operates in Aerospace & Defense (Industrials), while MTSI operates in Semiconductors (Technology). Over the past 3 years, RKLB returned 179.23%/yr vs 82.14%/yr for MTSI. At a 0.42 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
RKLB vs. MTSI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RKLB achieves a 62.92% return, which is significantly lower than MTSI's 111.27% return.
RKLB
- 1D
- 3.24%
- 1M
- 7.76%
- YTD
- 62.92%
- 6M
- 120.42%
- 1Y
- 292.98%
- 3Y*
- 179.23%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MTSI
- 1D
- 4.77%
- 1M
- 0.55%
- YTD
- 111.27%
- 6M
- 95.03%
- 1Y
- 189.40%
- 3Y*
- 82.14%
- 5Y*
- 43.33%
- 10Y*
- 25.43%
RKLB vs. MTSI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RKLB Rocket Lab USA, Inc. | 62.92% | 173.89% | 360.58% | 46.68% | -69.30% | 6.14% |
MTSI MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc. | 111.27% | 31.85% | 39.76% | 47.59% | -19.57% | 28.85% |
Correlation
The correlation between RKLB and MTSI is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 25, 2021 | 0.42 |
Fundamentals
RKLB:
$68.81B
MTSI:
$27.91B
RKLB:
-$0.33
MTSI:
$2.33
RKLB:
92.89
MTSI:
25.59
RKLB:
30.39
MTSI:
19.69
RKLB:
$679.58M
MTSI:
$1.07B
RKLB:
$248.43M
MTSI:
$594.25M
RKLB:
-$177.36M
MTSI:
$245.21M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RKLB vs. MTSI — Risk / Return Rank
RKLB
MTSI
RKLB vs. MTSI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rocket Lab USA, Inc. (RKLB) and MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc. (MTSI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RKLB | MTSI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.57 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.52 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.50 | -0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.86 | 9.66 | -2.80 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.94 | 25.31 | -9.37 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RKLB | MTSI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.20 | 3.77 | -0.57 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 1.00 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.49 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.76 | 0.45 | +0.31 |
Drawdowns
RKLB vs. MTSI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RKLB drawdown since its inception was -82.96%, roughly equal to the maximum MTSI drawdown of -80.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RKLB and MTSI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RKLB | MTSI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -82.96% | -80.78% | -2.18% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -43.01% | -19.74% | -23.27% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -55.49% | -41.09% | -14.40% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -44.86% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -80.78% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -24.35% | -11.67% | -12.68% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -51.40% | -26.23% | -25.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 18.48% | 7.52% | +10.96% |
Volatility
RKLB vs. MTSI - Volatility Comparison
Rocket Lab USA, Inc. (RKLB) has a higher volatility of 41.86% compared to MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc. (MTSI) at 20.61%. This indicates that RKLB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MTSI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RKLB | MTSI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 41.86% | 20.61% | +21.25% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 72.23% | 40.42% | +31.81% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 92.32% | 50.69% | +41.63% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 81.48% | 43.64% | +37.84% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 81.48% | 52.42% | +29.06% |
Dividends
RKLB vs. MTSI - Dividend Comparison
Neither RKLB nor MTSI has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
RKLB vs. MTSI - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Rocket Lab USA, Inc. and MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
RKLB vs. MTSI - Profitability Comparison
RKLB - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rocket Lab USA, Inc. reported a gross profit of 76.49M and revenue of 200.35M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 38.2%.
MTSI - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 164.43M and revenue of 288.96M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 56.9%.
RKLB - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rocket Lab USA, Inc. reported an operating income of -55.97M and revenue of 200.35M, resulting in an operating margin of -27.9%.
MTSI - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of 50.83M and revenue of 288.96M, resulting in an operating margin of 17.6%.
RKLB - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rocket Lab USA, Inc. reported a net income of -45.02M and revenue of 200.35M, resulting in a net margin of -22.5%.
MTSI - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of 46.33M and revenue of 288.96M, resulting in a net margin of 16.0%.
Frequently Asked Questions
RKLB and MTSI have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RKLB has higher volatility (41.86%) compared to MTSI (20.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RKLB dropped -82.96% vs MTSI's -80.78%.
MTSI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.77 vs 3.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RKLB and MTSI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer