RJVI vs. BINC
RJVI (RJ Eagle Vertical Income ETF) and BINC (iShares Flexible Income Active ETF) are both Multisector Bonds funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. RJVI charges 0.51%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for BINC.
Performance
RJVI vs. BINC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RJVI achieves a 2.14% return, which is significantly higher than BINC's 0.92% return.
RJVI
- 1D
- 0.22%
- 1M
- 0.79%
- YTD
- 2.14%
- 6M
- 2.14%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BINC
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 0.50%
- YTD
- 0.92%
- 6M
- 1.32%
- 1Y
- 5.62%
- 3Y*
- 7.00%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RJVI vs. BINC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
RJVI RJ Eagle Vertical Income ETF | 2.14% | 0.50% |
BINC iShares Flexible Income Active ETF | 0.92% | 1.19% |
Correlation
The correlation between RJVI and BINC is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 3, 2025 | 0.76 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RJVI vs. BINC — Risk / Return Rank
RJVI
BINC
RJVI vs. BINC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RJ Eagle Vertical Income ETF (RJVI) and iShares Flexible Income Active ETF (BINC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RJVI | BINC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.48 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.97 | 2.36 | -1.40 |
Drawdowns
RJVI vs. BINC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RJVI drawdown since its inception was -3.12%, which is greater than BINC's maximum drawdown of -2.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RJVI and BINC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RJVI | BINC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -3.12% | -2.69% | -0.43% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -2.69% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -2.69% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.04% | -0.47% | -0.57% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.02% | -0.36% | -0.66% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.68% | — |
Volatility
RJVI vs. BINC - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RJVI | BINC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.75% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 1.84% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.14% | 2.28% | +1.86% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.14% | 3.00% | +1.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.14% | 3.00% | +1.14% |
RJVI vs. BINC - Expense Ratio Comparison
RJVI has a 0.51% expense ratio, which is higher than BINC's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
RJVI vs. BINC - Dividend Comparison
RJVI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.60%, less than BINC's 5.86% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
BINC iShares Flexible Income Active ETF | 5.86% | 5.86% | 6.14% | 3.13% |
RJVI RJ Eagle Vertical Income ETF | 2.60% | 0.93% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RJVI and BINC have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BINC is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BINC is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.51% for RJVI.
BINC has the higher dividend yield at 5.86%, compared with 2.60% for RJVI.
They also come from different issuers: Carillon Tower Advisers and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.51% for RJVI and 0.40% for BINC.
Find the right allocation for RJVI and BINC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer