RJMI vs. IBMN
RJMI (RJ Eagle Municipal Income ETF) and IBMN (iShares iBonds Dec 2025 Term Muni Bond ETF) are both Municipal Bonds funds. RJMI is actively managed, while IBMN is passively managed. At a 0.16 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. RJMI charges 0.41%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for IBMN.
Performance
RJMI vs. IBMN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
RJMI
- 1D
- -0.06%
- 1M
- 0.87%
- YTD
- 1.64%
- 6M
- 2.35%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IBMN
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- 0.00%
- 6M
- 0.00%
- 1Y
- 1.20%
- 3Y*
- 2.44%
- 5Y*
- 0.47%
- 10Y*
- —
RJMI vs. IBMN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
RJMI RJ Eagle Municipal Income ETF | 1.64% | 2.82% |
IBMN iShares iBonds Dec 2025 Term Muni Bond ETF | 0.00% | 0.37% |
Correlation
The correlation between RJMI and IBMN is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 3, 2025 | 0.16 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RJMI vs. IBMN — Risk / Return Rank
RJMI
IBMN
RJMI vs. IBMN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RJ Eagle Municipal Income ETF (RJMI) and iShares iBonds Dec 2025 Term Muni Bond ETF (IBMN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RJMI | IBMN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.12 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.28 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.24 | 0.58 | +1.66 |
Drawdowns
RJMI vs. IBMN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RJMI drawdown since its inception was -3.04%, smaller than the maximum IBMN drawdown of -12.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RJMI and IBMN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RJMI | IBMN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -3.04% | -12.40% | +9.36% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -0.25% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -1.10% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -7.36% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.60% | -0.05% | -0.55% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.66% | -1.81% | +1.15% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.10% | — |
Volatility
RJMI vs. IBMN - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RJMI | IBMN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.00% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 0.50% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.08% | 0.71% | +2.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.08% | 1.80% | +1.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.08% | 3.89% | -0.81% |
RJMI vs. IBMN - Expense Ratio Comparison
RJMI has a 0.41% expense ratio, which is higher than IBMN's 0.18% expense ratio.
Dividends
RJMI vs. IBMN - Dividend Comparison
RJMI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.95%, more than IBMN's 1.14% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBMN iShares iBonds Dec 2025 Term Muni Bond ETF | 1.14% | 2.03% | 2.03% | 1.72% | 0.97% | 0.70% | 1.11% | 1.65% | 0.23% |
RJMI RJ Eagle Municipal Income ETF | 1.95% | 0.61% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RJMI and IBMN have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IBMN is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IBMN is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.41% for RJMI.
RJMI has the higher dividend yield at 1.95%, compared with 1.14% for IBMN.
They also come from different issuers: Carillon Tower Advisers and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.41% for RJMI and 0.18% for IBMN.
Find the right allocation for RJMI and IBMN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer