RIUS.L vs. FLQA.L

Last updated Jul 22, 2026

RIUS.L (L&G US ESG Paris Aligned UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and FLQA.L (Franklin FTSE Asia ex China ex Japan UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both exchange-traded funds - RIUS.L is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Solactive L&G United States Paris-aligned ESG SDG USD Index NTR, while FLQA.L is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the Linked FTSE Asia ex Japan ex China Index - Net Return. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, RIUS.L returned 12.29%/yr vs 13.16%/yr for FLQA.L. A 0.63 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. RIUS.L charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.14%/yr for FLQA.L.

Performance

RIUS.L vs. FLQA.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in L&G US ESG Paris Aligned UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (RIUS.L) and Franklin FTSE Asia ex China ex Japan UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (FLQA.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RIUS.L achieves a 8.40% return, which is significantly lower than FLQA.L's 35.09% return.

RIUS.L

• 1D: 0.41%
• 1M: -0.37%
• 6M: 8.97%
• YTD: 8.40%
• 1Y: 19.02%
• 3Y*: 19.93%
• 5Y*: 12.29%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 15.97%

FLQA.L

• 1D: 3.27%
• 1M: -9.01%
• 6M: 27.95%
• YTD: 35.09%
• 1Y: 53.14%
• 3Y*: 26.07%
• 5Y*: 13.16%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 10.13%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RIUS.L vs. FLQA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
RIUS.L L&G US ESG Paris Aligned UCITS ETF USD (Acc)	8.40%	18.88%	26.31%	30.95%	-23.30%	27.45%	25.19%	2.72%
FLQA.L Franklin FTSE Asia ex China ex Japan UCITS ETF USD (Acc)	35.09%	29.84%	7.76%	12.02%	-12.93%	4.57%	6.71%	3.24%

Correlation

The correlation between RIUS.L and FLQA.L is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.64
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.64
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.61
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 26, 2019	0.63

The correlation between RIUS.L and FLQA.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.61 to 0.64 - a consistent structural relationship.

RIUS.L vs. FLQA.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	RIUS.L	FLQA.L
Technology	44.4%	58.1%
Financial Services	11.8%	15.2%
Healthcare	10.1%	2.2%
Communication Services	9.8%	2.2%
Consumer Cyclical	9.3%	4.2%
Industrials	7.9%	7.8%
Consumer Defensive	3.2%	2.0%
Basic Materials	2.1%	2.9%
Real Estate	1.3%	1.7%
Utilities	0.1%	1.8%
Energy	-	2.0%

Return for Risk

RIUS.L vs. FLQA.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RIUS.L

RIUS.L Risk / Return Rank: 51
RIUS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 51
RIUS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
RIUS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 50
RIUS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 46
RIUS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 55

FLQA.L

FLQA.L Risk / Return Rank: 83
FLQA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
FLQA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 79
FLQA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 82
FLQA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
FLQA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 81

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RIUS.L vs. FLQA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for L&G US ESG Paris Aligned UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (RIUS.L) and Franklin FTSE Asia ex China ex Japan UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (FLQA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	RIUS.L	FLQA.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.35	2.09	-0.74
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.05	2.70	-0.64
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.24	1.37	-0.13
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.77	3.73	-1.96
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.06	11.55	-4.49

RIUS.L vs. FLQA.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RIUS.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.35, which is lower than the FLQA.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RIUS.L and FLQA.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

RIUS.L vs. FLQA.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RIUS.L drawdown since its inception was -33.35%, which is greater than FLQA.L's maximum drawdown of -29.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RIUS.L and FLQA.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	RIUS.L	FLQA.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.35%	-29.21%	-4.14%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.68%	-14.19%	+3.51%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-20.30%	-22.19%	+1.89%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-27.59%	-25.38%	-2.21%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.85%	-10.95%	+9.10%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.29%	-7.23%	+0.94%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.69%	4.59%	-1.90%

Volatility

RIUS.L vs. FLQA.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for L&G US ESG Paris Aligned UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (RIUS.L) is 3.94%, while Franklin FTSE Asia ex China ex Japan UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (FLQA.L) has a volatility of 11.26%. This indicates that RIUS.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FLQA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RIUS.L	FLQA.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.94%	11.26%	-7.32%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.22%	23.25%	-12.03%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.08%	25.36%	-11.28%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.33%	17.81%	-0.48%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.15%	18.55%	+0.60%

RIUS.L vs. FLQA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

RIUS.L has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than FLQA.L's 0.14% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

RIUS.L vs. FLQA.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither RIUS.L nor FLQA.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RIUS.L and FLQA.L in my portfolio?

RIUS.L and FLQA.L have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, RIUS.L or FLQA.L?

On fees, RIUS.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, RIUS.L or FLQA.L?

RIUS.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.14% for FLQA.L.

What is the main difference between RIUS.L and FLQA.L?

RIUS.L is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while FLQA.L is Asia Pacific Equities. RIUS.L tracks Solactive L&G United States Paris-aligned ESG SDG USD Index NTR, while FLQA.L tracks Linked FTSE Asia ex Japan ex China Index - Net Return. They also come from different issuers: L&G and Franklin. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for RIUS.L and 0.14% for FLQA.L.