RIUS.L vs. AUCO.L

Last updated Jul 16, 2026

RIUS.L (L&G US ESG Paris Aligned UCITS ETF) and AUCO.L (L&G Gold Mining UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RIUS.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the L&G US ESG Paris Aligned UCITS ETF, while AUCO.L is a Gold fund tracking the STOXX Global Gold Miners Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, RIUS.L returned 12.67%/yr vs 22.07%/yr for AUCO.L. At a 0.27 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. RIUS.L charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for AUCO.L.

Performance

RIUS.L vs. AUCO.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in L&G US ESG Paris Aligned UCITS ETF (RIUS.L) and L&G Gold Mining UCITS ETF (AUCO.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RIUS.L achieves a 9.48% return, which is significantly higher than AUCO.L's -14.70% return.

RIUS.L

• 1D: -0.04%
• 1M: -0.07%
• 6M: 9.26%
• YTD: 9.48%
• 1Y: 21.59%
• 3Y*: 20.56%
• 5Y*: 12.67%
• 10Y*: —

AUCO.L

• 1D: -2.98%
• 1M: -14.48%
• 6M: -23.42%
• YTD: -14.70%
• 1Y: 48.05%
• 3Y*: 41.28%
• 5Y*: 22.07%
• 10Y*: 11.99%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RIUS.L vs. AUCO.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
RIUS.L L&G US ESG Paris Aligned UCITS ETF	9.48%	18.88%	26.31%	30.95%	-23.30%	27.45%	25.19%	2.72%
AUCO.L L&G Gold Mining UCITS ETF	-14.70%	181.83%	17.96%	15.02%	-14.30%	-10.12%	21.72%	12.69%

Correlation

The correlation between RIUS.L and AUCO.L is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.44
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.27
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.28
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 26, 2019	0.27

The correlation between RIUS.L and AUCO.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.27 (3 years) to 0.44 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

RIUS.L vs. AUCO.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RIUS.L

RIUS.L Risk / Return Rank: 58
RIUS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 58
RIUS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 64
RIUS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 57
RIUS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 51
RIUS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 59

AUCO.L

AUCO.L Risk / Return Rank: 30
AUCO.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 32
AUCO.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 32
AUCO.L Omega Ratio Rank: 31
AUCO.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 30
AUCO.L Martin Ratio Rank: 27

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RIUS.L vs. AUCO.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for L&G US ESG Paris Aligned UCITS ETF (RIUS.L) and L&G Gold Mining UCITS ETF (AUCO.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	RIUS.L	AUCO.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.59	0.98	+0.61
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.39	1.49	+0.90
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.29	1.18	+0.10
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.08	1.27	+0.81
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.33	2.97	+5.36

RIUS.L vs. AUCO.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RIUS.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.59, which is higher than the AUCO.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RIUS.L and AUCO.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

RIUS.L vs. AUCO.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RIUS.L drawdown since its inception was -33.35%, smaller than the maximum AUCO.L drawdown of -78.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RIUS.L and AUCO.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	RIUS.L	AUCO.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.35%	-78.30%	+44.95%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.68%	-37.60%	+26.92%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-20.30%	-37.60%	+17.30%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-27.59%	-48.62%	+21.03%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-54.47%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.87%	-36.38%	+35.51%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.30%	-40.73%	+34.43%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.68%	16.11%	-13.43%

Volatility

RIUS.L vs. AUCO.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for L&G US ESG Paris Aligned UCITS ETF (RIUS.L) is 3.68%, while L&G Gold Mining UCITS ETF (AUCO.L) has a volatility of 16.05%. This indicates that RIUS.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AUCO.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RIUS.L	AUCO.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.68%	16.05%	-12.37%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.21%	39.39%	-28.18%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.05%	48.92%	-34.87%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.35%	38.99%	-21.64%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.16%	35.75%	-16.59%

RIUS.L vs. AUCO.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

RIUS.L has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than AUCO.L's 0.55% expense ratio.

Dividends

RIUS.L vs. AUCO.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither RIUS.L nor AUCO.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RIUS.L and AUCO.L in my portfolio?

RIUS.L and AUCO.L have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, RIUS.L or AUCO.L?

On fees, RIUS.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, RIUS.L or AUCO.L?

RIUS.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for AUCO.L.

What is the main difference between RIUS.L and AUCO.L?

RIUS.L is categorized as Global Equities, while AUCO.L is Gold. RIUS.L tracks L&G US ESG Paris Aligned UCITS ETF, while AUCO.L tracks STOXX Global Gold Miners Index. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for RIUS.L and 0.55% for AUCO.L.