RIUS.L vs. BBDD.L
RIUS.L (L&G US ESG Paris Aligned UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and BBDD.L (JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Equity UCITS ETF (Dist)) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds - RIUS.L tracks the Solactive L&G United States Paris-aligned ESG SDG USD Index NTR while BBDD.L tracks the Russell 1000 TR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, RIUS.L returned 12.29%/yr vs 12.35%/yr for BBDD.L. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. RIUS.L charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for BBDD.L.
Performance
RIUS.L vs. BBDD.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
RIUS.L is traded in USD, while BBDD.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the BBDD.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with RIUS.L having a 8.40% return and BBDD.L slightly higher at 8.71%.
RIUS.L
- 1D
- 0.41%
- 1M
- -0.37%
- 6M
- 8.97%
- YTD
- 8.40%
- 1Y
- 19.02%
- 3Y*
- 19.93%
- 5Y*
- 12.29%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 15.97%
BBDD.L
- 1D
- -1.16%
- 1M
- -0.28%
- 6M
- 9.38%
- YTD
- 8.71%
- 1Y
- 18.66%
- 3Y*
- 19.47%
- 5Y*
- 12.35%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 15.34%
RIUS.L vs. BBDD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RIUS.L L&G US ESG Paris Aligned UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 8.40% | 18.88% | 26.31% | 30.95% | -23.30% | 27.45% | 25.19% | 2.72% |
BBDD.L JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Equity UCITS ETF (Dist) | 8.71% | 17.66% | 25.08% | 27.09% | -20.02% | 28.05% | 19.67% | 3.49% |
Correlation
The correlation between RIUS.L and BBDD.L is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 26, 2019 | 0.92 |
The correlation between RIUS.L and BBDD.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.
RIUS.L vs. BBDD.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
RIUS.L
BBDD.L
Technology
Financial Services
Healthcare
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Utilities
Energy
-
Technology
RIUS.L
BBDD.L
Financial Services
RIUS.L
BBDD.L
Healthcare
RIUS.L
BBDD.L
Communication Services
RIUS.L
BBDD.L
Consumer Cyclical
RIUS.L
BBDD.L
Industrials
RIUS.L
BBDD.L
Consumer Defensive
RIUS.L
BBDD.L
Basic Materials
RIUS.L
BBDD.L
Real Estate
RIUS.L
BBDD.L
Utilities
RIUS.L
BBDD.L
Energy
RIUS.L
-
BBDD.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RIUS.L vs. BBDD.L — Risk / Return Rank
RIUS.L
BBDD.L
RIUS.L vs. BBDD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for L&G US ESG Paris Aligned UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (RIUS.L) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Equity UCITS ETF (Dist) (BBDD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RIUS.L | BBDD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.30 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.35 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.29 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.77 | 2.11 | -0.34 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.06 | 8.57 | -1.50 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RIUS.L vs. BBDD.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RIUS.L drawdown since its inception was -33.35%, roughly equal to the maximum BBDD.L drawdown of -33.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RIUS.L and BBDD.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RIUS.L | BBDD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.35% | -33.67% | +0.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.68% | -9.13% | -1.55% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.30% | -19.47% | -0.83% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.59% | -26.16% | -1.43% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.85% | -1.67% | -0.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.29% | -5.33% | -0.96% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.69% | 2.25% | +0.44% |
Volatility
RIUS.L vs. BBDD.L - Volatility Comparison
L&G US ESG Paris Aligned UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (RIUS.L) has a higher volatility of 3.94% compared to JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Equity UCITS ETF (Dist) (BBDD.L) at 3.38%. This indicates that RIUS.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BBDD.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RIUS.L | BBDD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.94% | 3.38% | +0.56% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.22% | 8.87% | +2.35% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.08% | 11.76% | +2.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.33% | 15.87% | +1.46% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.15% | 17.39% | +1.76% |
RIUS.L vs. BBDD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
RIUS.L has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is higher than BBDD.L's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
RIUS.L vs. BBDD.L - Dividend Comparison
RIUS.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BBDD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.12%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BBDD.L JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Equity UCITS ETF (Dist) | 1.12% | 1.12% | 0.99% | 1.31% | 1.44% | 0.94% | 1.46% | 0.79% |
RIUS.L L&G US ESG Paris Aligned UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RIUS.L and BBDD.L have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BBDD.L is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BBDD.L is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.12% for RIUS.L.
RIUS.L tracks Solactive L&G United States Paris-aligned ESG SDG USD Index NTR, while BBDD.L tracks Russell 1000 TR USD. They also come from different issuers: L&G and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for RIUS.L and 0.05% for BBDD.L.
Find the right allocation for RIUS.L and BBDD.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer