PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RITA vs. XLRI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RITA vs. XLRI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ETFB Green SRI REITs ETF (RITA) and State Street Real Estate Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLRI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RITA achieves a 14.27% return, which is significantly higher than XLRI's 7.92% return.


RITA

1D
-0.04%
1M
1.61%
6M
12.27%
YTD
14.27%
1Y
18.83%
3Y*
8.06%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-0.35%

XLRI

1D
-0.49%
1M
0.85%
6M
6.33%
YTD
7.92%
1Y
10.04%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
7.22%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$160.52K$90.77K$56.08K
$67.65K$68.45K$64.14K

RITA vs. XLRI - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between RITA and XLRI is 0.87, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 30, 2025

0.87

The correlation between RITA and XLRI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RITA vs. XLRI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

RITA
RITA Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
RITA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RITA Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
RITA Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
RITA Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
RITA Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

XLRI
XLRI Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
XLRI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLRI Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLRI Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
XLRI Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLRI Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

RITA vs. XLRI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ETFB Green SRI REITs ETF (RITA) and State Street Real Estate Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLRI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RITAXLRIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.47

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.69

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.17

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.12

1.42

+0.70

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.60

4.95

+2.65

RITA vs. XLRI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RITA Sharpe Ratio is 1.39, which is higher than the XLRI Sharpe Ratio of 0.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RITA and XLRI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RITA vs. XLRI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RITA drawdown since its inception was -35.92%, which is greater than XLRI's maximum drawdown of -7.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RITA and XLRI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RITAXLRIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.92%

-7.12%

-28.80%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.93%

-7.12%

-1.81%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.85%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.15%

-1.11%

-5.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.17%

-1.54%

-18.63%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.48%

2.03%

+0.45%

Volatility

RITA vs. XLRI - Volatility Comparison

ETFB Green SRI REITs ETF (RITA) has a higher volatility of 4.54% compared to State Street Real Estate Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLRI) at 3.34%. This indicates that RITA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLRI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RITAXLRIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.54%

3.34%

+1.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.24%

8.74%

+2.50%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.67%

11.02%

+2.65%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.75%

11.10%

+6.65%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.75%

11.10%

+6.65%

RITA vs. XLRI - Expense Ratio Comparison

RITA has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than XLRI's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

RITA vs. XLRI - Dividend Comparison

RITA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.32%, less than XLRI's 14.37% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
RITA
ETFB Green SRI REITs ETF
2.32%2.50%3.12%3.25%2.41%0.21%
XLRI
State Street Real Estate Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF
14.37%6.85%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


RITA and XLRI have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RITA has higher volatility (4.54%) compared to XLRI (3.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RITA dropped -35.92% vs XLRI's -7.12%.

On 1-year performance, RITA leads with 18.83% vs 10.04% for XLRI. On fees, XLRI is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, XLRI has been the lower-risk option at 3.34%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, RITA has performed better with a 18.83% return vs 10.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XLRI is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for RITA.

XLRI has the higher dividend yield at 14.37%, compared with 2.32% for RITA.

RITA is categorized as REIT, while XLRI is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: ETFB and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for RITA and 0.35% for XLRI.

RITA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.39 vs 0.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RITA and XLRI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer