RITA vs. DBC
RITA (ETFB Green SRI REITs ETF) and DBC (Invesco DB Commodity Index Tracking Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - RITA is a REIT fund tracking the FTSE EPRA Nareit IdealRatings Developed REITs Islamic Green Capped Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while DBC is a Commodities fund tracking the DBIQ Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Index Excess Return. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, RITA returned 6.19%/yr vs 11.04%/yr for DBC. At a 0.05 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. RITA charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for DBC.
Performance
RITA vs. DBC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RITA achieves a 12.58% return, which is significantly lower than DBC's 26.70% return.
RITA
- 1D
- 0.68%
- 1M
- 2.09%
- 6M
- 11.85%
- YTD
- 12.58%
- 1Y
- 15.38%
- 3Y*
- 6.19%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DBC
- 1D
- 2.94%
- 1M
- -0.77%
- 6M
- 22.16%
- YTD
- 26.70%
- 1Y
- 30.09%
- 3Y*
- 11.04%
- 5Y*
- 11.23%
- 10Y*
- 8.42%
RITA vs. DBC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RITA ETFB Green SRI REITs ETF | 12.58% | 3.93% | 1.93% | 9.66% | -29.30% | 4.81% |
DBC Invesco DB Commodity Index Tracking Fund | 26.70% | 8.10% | 2.18% | -6.19% | 19.34% | 1.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between RITA and DBC is -0.14, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.14 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.05 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 9, 2021 | 0.05 |
The correlation between RITA and DBC shifts across timeframes, from -0.14 (1 year) to 0.05 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RITA vs. DBC — Risk / Return Rank
RITA
DBC
RITA vs. DBC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ETFB Green SRI REITs ETF (RITA) and Invesco DB Commodity Index Tracking Fund (DBC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RITA | DBC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.47 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.60 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.28 | -0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.73 | 1.83 | -0.10 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.02 | 6.41 | -0.39 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RITA vs. DBC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RITA drawdown since its inception was -35.92%, smaller than the maximum DBC drawdown of -76.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RITA and DBC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RITA | DBC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.92% | -76.36% | +40.44% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.93% | -16.54% | +7.61% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.85% | -16.54% | -4.31% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -27.34% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -41.71% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.54% | -26.71% | +19.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.37% | -46.13% | +25.76% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.56% | 4.71% | -2.15% |
Volatility
RITA vs. DBC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ETFB Green SRI REITs ETF (RITA) is 4.55%, while Invesco DB Commodity Index Tracking Fund (DBC) has a volatility of 6.07%. This indicates that RITA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DBC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RITA | DBC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.55% | 6.07% | -1.52% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.83% | 16.67% | -5.84% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.57% | 18.84% | -5.27% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.76% | 19.28% | -1.52% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.76% | 17.80% | -0.04% |
RITA vs. DBC - Expense Ratio Comparison
RITA has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than DBC's 0.85% expense ratio.
Dividends
RITA vs. DBC - Dividend Comparison
RITA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.35%, less than DBC's 2.63% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBC Invesco DB Commodity Index Tracking Fund | 2.63% | 3.33% | 5.22% | 4.94% | 0.59% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.59% | 1.30% |
RITA ETFB Green SRI REITs ETF | 2.35% | 2.50% | 3.12% | 3.25% | 2.41% | 0.21% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RITA and DBC have a correlation of -0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DBC has higher volatility (6.07%) compared to RITA (4.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RITA dropped -35.92% vs DBC's -76.36%.
On 3-year performance, DBC leads with 11.04% vs 6.19% for RITA. On fees, RITA is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, RITA has been the lower-risk option at 4.55%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, DBC has performed better with a 11.04% return vs 6.19%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
RITA is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for DBC.
DBC has the higher dividend yield at 2.63%, compared with 2.35% for RITA.
RITA is categorized as REIT, while DBC is Commodities. RITA tracks FTSE EPRA Nareit IdealRatings Developed REITs Islamic Green Capped Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while DBC tracks DBIQ Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Index Excess Return. They also come from different issuers: ETFB and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for RITA and 0.85% for DBC.
DBC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.61 vs 1.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RITA and DBC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer